This week, due to overwhelming popular demand, I'm going back to basics. No theory, no skills building. No homework assignments, no psychology. I promise not to use the word feeling or the word emotion. Definitely no life lessons, or political agendas.
This one is for the dude on his lunch break who just wants to know who to start this week. It's for the guy who's just taking a time out from his day and doesn't want to think about modern portfolio theory, or whatever else is on my mind today.
Without you readers I'm just some guy smoking way too many cigarettes typing into the abyss. Thank you one and all for removing the abyss part.
Fantasy Football Information Starts Here:
We all know the value of the big play. There are bonus points and usually touchdowns involved when secondaries get beat deep. All of the teams detailed in this article are allowing close to one pass over 40 yards per game. You can take advantage of these teams right now.
Detroit Lions: 8 Pass Plays Over 40 Yards Allowed In 8 Games
It's not surprising at all that the horrific Detroit Lions have allowed more pass plays over 40 yards than all but one team in the league. One would be hard pressed to find a defensive statistic in which the Lions were not ranked at the bottom of the league. Play all offensive players against Detroit. Moving On.
Seattle Seahawks: 8 pass Plays Over 40 Yards Allowed In 8 Games
I hate it when my home team shows up in a piece like this. Kelly Jennings (CB) is getting scorch marks on his face he's burned so often in coverage. On one play yesterday he managed to get turned around, fall, commit illegal contact, and allow a 17 yard reception. Hitting for the cycle of defensive back ineptitude.
The Seahawks miss Ray Rhodes so much it hurts. The defense returned 11 starters from a unit that played extremely well last year. John Marshall's schemes have not provided adequate pass pressure to give the defensive backfield a chance.
This struggling unit got more bad news on Friday. Patrick Kearney, who aggravated an old shoulder injury against the 49ers will be out indefinitely.
The Eagles got a 44 yard reception out of back-up tight end Brent Celek Sunday afternoon. Donovan McNabb was only sacked once. With struggles continuing on both sides of the ball, opposing players should post big numbers against the Seahawks.
New England Patriots: 7 Pass Plays Over 40 Yards Allowed In 8 Games
One would not expect a Bill Belicheck coached unit to be allowing big plays at this rate. The New England Patriots have been a defense to avoid for as long as I can remember. The Patriots are missing Asante Samuel immensely. This undersized unit can be exploited by taller wide receivers.
Last night Reggie Wayne was able to use his body to create space between himself and defenders. Anthony Gonzalez won a jump ball to bring in one of his two touchdowns.
Santonio Holmes should be able to take advantage of his height in week 13, assuming he isn't dealing with any league suspensions at that time. The Patriots should also have trouble in week 16 when Anquan Boldin and Larry Fitzgerald come to town.
San Francisco Forty-Niners: 7 Pass Plays Over 40 Yards Allowed In 8 Games
Head coach Mike Singletary made quite a few waves in his first game. He benched J.T O'Sullivan, and ejected Vernon Davis. The 49ers have had a problem protecting the quarterback. Some blame Mike Martz's system, but it appears Mr. Singletary believes O'Sullivan was holding the ball too long. Shaun Hill has been named the starter going forward.
When an offense has problems, the defense gets over worked and eventually coverages get blown. Leonard Weaver, Seattle's fullback, managed to catch two touchdown passes over forty yards last week.
If nobody on your defense can catch a fullback from behind, you've got real problems. Hopefully for 49ers fans Mike Singletary will be able to get better play out of his defense, in the mean time fantasy owners should start their receivers when San Francisco comes calling.
Miami Dolphins: 7 Pass Plays Over 40 Yards Allowed In 8 Games
The Dolphins have improved since their 1-15 campaign one year ago. The Wildcat offense makes great use of their resources, and at 4-4 they are a legitimate playoff contender.
They do, however, allow more than their fair share of big pass plays. Bronco's fullback Peyton Hillis was able to break loose for a 47 yard play yesterday. Baltimore Raven's running back Ray Rice also has a forty yard reception against Miami.
Vincent Jackson, and Andre Johnson have proved that wide receivers can get in on the action against the resurgent Dolphins. Lee Evans and Randy Moss are licking their chops thinking about their future dates with the club.
Frank Gore and Leon Washington might have standout days catching passes out of the backfield against San Francisco as well.
Honorable Mention (Sort of):
The Cardinals, Jaguars, Bills, and Texans have each allowed six big plays in eight games.
Friday, October 31, 2008
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
C'mon Oprah, Buy an NFL Team
Dear Oprah Winfrey,
Please buy an NFL franchise.
Buy an NFL franchise 'cause it would be fun! Can you say eye candy? Gayle would love you forever, and I'm sure Steadman wouldn't mind eight dates per year in the owners box. How else can a woman make her best friend and significant other THAT happy in one shopping trip?
Buy an NFL franchise 'cause it's good business. You can put a book on the best sellers list with a mention. You can cripple an industry with an offhand comment. Are you telling me you can't sell out 10 little home games?
Adam Glassman can design uniforms so the offensive linemen no longer look like schlumpadinkas, or schlumpadinkos. Whatever the male term for the schlumpadink is.
You could do a show called "Exes and Oh's" where you interview ex-wives and girlfriends of players, and find out what it's really like to be an NFL wife. Maybe throw in a competition for a date with your team's most eligible bachelor. Women love muscular men in tight pants and women love you. How can combining these two great loves not work out?
You'd be like the peanut butter and chocolate of the entertainment industry.
Dr. Phil could run a rookie "Boot Camp" where he counsels new players through the tough choices they're going to have to make as an NFL star. Seminars could include topics like:
"Nightclub Exit Strategies"
"How To Fire Your Bodyguard Non-Violently"
"I Know You Don't Hear It Very Often, But No Means No"
"Don't Drive With Weed"
"Or Cocaine, Silly"
"Dragging Her By The Hair Doesn't Improve Your Argument"
"Normally, Women Do The Drink Throwing"
OK the boot camp might have to be a little long, but you get where I'm going.
Dr. Oz could be on your medical staff, and perhaps through hypnosis we could find out what goes through one's mind during a concussion.
Buy an NFL franchise because the NFL needs you. The NFL needs an African-American owner. Why not you? The banks aren't exactly lending money these days and you've got the cash.
Who could possibly do a better job of teaching this group of high profile men respect for women? Jerry Jones? I don't think the "Sex Boat" would've happened if Oprah Winfrey was on the NFL's competition committee. It wouldn't be so acceptable to drag your girlfriend down a flight stairs if Harpo Entertainment owned a team.
You make an impact Oprah, help some young brothers out.
Buy an NFL franchise 'cause you have the best giveaways. How cool would it be to find out everyone in the stadium just won a car?
Just buy an NFL franchise. Please? You'll make money, and help the league we love so much.
Please buy an NFL franchise.
Buy an NFL franchise 'cause it would be fun! Can you say eye candy? Gayle would love you forever, and I'm sure Steadman wouldn't mind eight dates per year in the owners box. How else can a woman make her best friend and significant other THAT happy in one shopping trip?
Buy an NFL franchise 'cause it's good business. You can put a book on the best sellers list with a mention. You can cripple an industry with an offhand comment. Are you telling me you can't sell out 10 little home games?
Adam Glassman can design uniforms so the offensive linemen no longer look like schlumpadinkas, or schlumpadinkos. Whatever the male term for the schlumpadink is.
You could do a show called "Exes and Oh's" where you interview ex-wives and girlfriends of players, and find out what it's really like to be an NFL wife. Maybe throw in a competition for a date with your team's most eligible bachelor. Women love muscular men in tight pants and women love you. How can combining these two great loves not work out?
You'd be like the peanut butter and chocolate of the entertainment industry.
Dr. Phil could run a rookie "Boot Camp" where he counsels new players through the tough choices they're going to have to make as an NFL star. Seminars could include topics like:
"Nightclub Exit Strategies"
"How To Fire Your Bodyguard Non-Violently"
"I Know You Don't Hear It Very Often, But No Means No"
"Don't Drive With Weed"
"Or Cocaine, Silly"
"Dragging Her By The Hair Doesn't Improve Your Argument"
"Normally, Women Do The Drink Throwing"
OK the boot camp might have to be a little long, but you get where I'm going.
Dr. Oz could be on your medical staff, and perhaps through hypnosis we could find out what goes through one's mind during a concussion.
Buy an NFL franchise because the NFL needs you. The NFL needs an African-American owner. Why not you? The banks aren't exactly lending money these days and you've got the cash.
Who could possibly do a better job of teaching this group of high profile men respect for women? Jerry Jones? I don't think the "Sex Boat" would've happened if Oprah Winfrey was on the NFL's competition committee. It wouldn't be so acceptable to drag your girlfriend down a flight stairs if Harpo Entertainment owned a team.
You make an impact Oprah, help some young brothers out.
Buy an NFL franchise 'cause you have the best giveaways. How cool would it be to find out everyone in the stadium just won a car?
Just buy an NFL franchise. Please? You'll make money, and help the league we love so much.
Monday, October 27, 2008
Seahawk's Defense Holds In Rout Of Niners
The Seattle Seahawks broke their three game losing streak, beating San Francisco 34-13 on Sunday.
On the 49ers first drive the Hawks sacked J.T O'Sullivan, forcing a fumble which was almost returned for a touchdown. While the defense didn't recover the fumble, they set the theme for the day: pressure.
Rocky Bernard recorded two sacks on the day. Patrick Kearney, Julian Peterson, and Craig Terrill, would get one a piece as the Seahawks spent all afternoon in the 49ers backfield. Four forced fumbles, and two interceptions later victory was in hand.
When defenses get to the quarterback, good things happen. John Marshall put together the right packages to keep both J.T O'Sullivan and Shaun Hill uncomfortable in the pocket.
Frank Gore was held under 100 yards rushing, LeRoy Hill made his presence felt with nine tackles. San Francisco could not move the ball consistently all afternoon.
Offensively the Seahawks were able to get fullback Leonard Weaver isolated on a middle linebacker. Weaver's deceptive speed burned the Niners for two long touchdowns in the second half.
The Seahawks finally got the kind of play they have been needing on both sides of the ball, and despite their 2-5 record still have a chance to make the playoffs.
The Philadelphia Eagles come to Qwest field this Sunday. The Seahawks will have to execute on both sides of the ball if they want to make it two in a row.
Sidenote: To all those who took my advice and picked on the Seahawks this week...sorry.
On the 49ers first drive the Hawks sacked J.T O'Sullivan, forcing a fumble which was almost returned for a touchdown. While the defense didn't recover the fumble, they set the theme for the day: pressure.
Rocky Bernard recorded two sacks on the day. Patrick Kearney, Julian Peterson, and Craig Terrill, would get one a piece as the Seahawks spent all afternoon in the 49ers backfield. Four forced fumbles, and two interceptions later victory was in hand.
When defenses get to the quarterback, good things happen. John Marshall put together the right packages to keep both J.T O'Sullivan and Shaun Hill uncomfortable in the pocket.
Frank Gore was held under 100 yards rushing, LeRoy Hill made his presence felt with nine tackles. San Francisco could not move the ball consistently all afternoon.
Offensively the Seahawks were able to get fullback Leonard Weaver isolated on a middle linebacker. Weaver's deceptive speed burned the Niners for two long touchdowns in the second half.
The Seahawks finally got the kind of play they have been needing on both sides of the ball, and despite their 2-5 record still have a chance to make the playoffs.
The Philadelphia Eagles come to Qwest field this Sunday. The Seahawks will have to execute on both sides of the ball if they want to make it two in a row.
Sidenote: To all those who took my advice and picked on the Seahawks this week...sorry.
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Fantasy Football: Pick On The Seahawks
I'm probably a little late to the party, but it's officially safe to start picking on the Seahawks.
Ugh.
As a resident of Seattle it has been particularly hard for me to come to this self evident conclusion. But you have to practice what you preach. Fantasy football decisions are not to be made with your heart. While I still HOPE the Seahawks will be able to stop offenses for the remainder of the year, I don't THINK it's going to happen.
The trouble began all the way back in week two. The Hawks were hosting rookie J.T. O'Sullivan and the San Francisco 49ers. After 3 1/2 quarters of mostly poor play Olindo Mare had jsut kicked a 32 yard field goal to give the Seahawks a 30-27 lead.
The Seahawks Defense needed to hold the Niners scoreless for 7:41 in order to claim victory. O'Sullivan cut through the Seahawks defense like a hot knife through butter. Twelve plays and 4:59 later Joe Nedney was kicking a field goal to tie the game. So much fo that.
With 2:46 on the clock the Seahawks embarked on a 4 play drive ending in a punt from their own eighteen yard line. After the punt the 49ers took over possesion on at midfield. Crap.
Young J.T looked like he was playing the scout team quickly moving his team into field goal range. With three seconds left Joe Nedney lined up to seal the Seahawks fate with a 41 yard field goal attempt. A miracle happened: he missed.
The 49ers won the toss, and this time it took O'Sullivan 4:40 seconds and 10 plays to give Nedney his chance at redemption. Nedney made good, and Seattle was devastated.
The Seahawks defense had three opportunities to force a rookie quarterback off the field and they couldn't convert on any of them. Who are they going to be able to stop? I asked myself. The answer turned out to be nobody.
The New York Giants scored on their first six possessions against Seattle.
The Green Bay Packers hung 27 on them.
Last week Jeff Garcia threw for over 300 yards.
This week the Seahawks take their collander defense down to Candlestick Park. Even with the coaching change down there, I expect J.T O'Sullivan to pick up where he left off here at Qwest.
I don't want that to happen, but I still think it will.
Ugh.
As a resident of Seattle it has been particularly hard for me to come to this self evident conclusion. But you have to practice what you preach. Fantasy football decisions are not to be made with your heart. While I still HOPE the Seahawks will be able to stop offenses for the remainder of the year, I don't THINK it's going to happen.
The trouble began all the way back in week two. The Hawks were hosting rookie J.T. O'Sullivan and the San Francisco 49ers. After 3 1/2 quarters of mostly poor play Olindo Mare had jsut kicked a 32 yard field goal to give the Seahawks a 30-27 lead.
The Seahawks Defense needed to hold the Niners scoreless for 7:41 in order to claim victory. O'Sullivan cut through the Seahawks defense like a hot knife through butter. Twelve plays and 4:59 later Joe Nedney was kicking a field goal to tie the game. So much fo that.
With 2:46 on the clock the Seahawks embarked on a 4 play drive ending in a punt from their own eighteen yard line. After the punt the 49ers took over possesion on at midfield. Crap.
Young J.T looked like he was playing the scout team quickly moving his team into field goal range. With three seconds left Joe Nedney lined up to seal the Seahawks fate with a 41 yard field goal attempt. A miracle happened: he missed.
The 49ers won the toss, and this time it took O'Sullivan 4:40 seconds and 10 plays to give Nedney his chance at redemption. Nedney made good, and Seattle was devastated.
The Seahawks defense had three opportunities to force a rookie quarterback off the field and they couldn't convert on any of them. Who are they going to be able to stop? I asked myself. The answer turned out to be nobody.
The New York Giants scored on their first six possessions against Seattle.
The Green Bay Packers hung 27 on them.
Last week Jeff Garcia threw for over 300 yards.
This week the Seahawks take their collander defense down to Candlestick Park. Even with the coaching change down there, I expect J.T O'Sullivan to pick up where he left off here at Qwest.
I don't want that to happen, but I still think it will.
Fantasy Football: Coquer Selective Amnesia
Selective Amnesia
Little kids do it all the time. Somehow they “forget” what you told them not to do hours before. Husbands somehow fail to hear their wives say: “Take out the garbage.” Girlfriends don’t recall that Wednesday night is poker night. Every week.
Our minds are slaves to our desires, and we choose to remember things better when it suits us. We all have the desire to think of ourselves as above average in all things, when that can’t possibly be the case.
“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
George Santayana
When our minds erase information that lowers our self-esteem, we cripple our ability to improve at activities. How can we learn from experience if we can’t trust our memory of events?
When it comes to decision-making our minds tend to give us too much credit for things that go right, while we bear almost none of the blame for things that go wrong. While I focus on how you can improve your fantasy football decisions in this article, the same theory applies to other aspects of life.
Delusions of Grandeur
We tend to think too much of our impact on random events. From knocking on wood, to lucky shirts, people feel the need to control life. When extremely good things happen to us, we tend to think we are solely responsible for our glory. For instance:
If you’ve got Kurt Warner on your team, you are nowhere near as smart as you think you are. Greg Jennings was not a lock to outscore Randy Moss this year. Random things happened, and we are where we are. Don’t pat yourself on the back so much.
The human mind is a funny thing: once we know something, it’s hard to imagine a world where it was unknown. People used to think the world was flat, and the center of the universe. Now we know better, and it’s hard to imagine a time where this information didn’t exist.
Once we saw Tom Brady’s record-breaking year, it was hard to call it anything other than inevitable. Where are all the people who were talking about Randy Moss becoming a cancer on the team?
Where are all the people who thought the Green Bay Packers’ offense couldn’t function without Brett Favre?
It’s not only good results that we process poorly, negative outcomes are misinterpreted by our brains as well.
Cry Me A River!
When we lose fantasy games we are keenly aware of all the outside factors that contributed to our defeat. Our star player got injured. We didn’t have enough time to prepare for the draft, and who could have predicted that the Cardinals would be doing so well anyway?
We just got unlucky. It wasn’t our fault, and we couldn’t have possibly foreseen what happened. Do any of these statements sound familiar?
Our brains are equipped with an ego defense mechanism that systematically shuts out information that lowers our self-esteem. This phenomenon when combined with our natural selective memory can make learning from experience extremely difficult. When we do well it was due to our genius and preparation. When we do poorly it was due to misfortune. How can we learn from experience if we won't give ourselves honest analysis of the facts?
Action Steps:
How can we conquer our own minds and learn from our experience faster than ever before? I've devised a quick worksheet that will force you to make a record of your predictions and your results. This five-minute exercise will tell you how your previous guesses have done. The first step towards making better guesses in the future.
1. Print out your lineup every week with the "projected stats" included.
2. Guess whether each player will score above or below his projection, and mark with an up or down arrow.
3. Write the reason for your guess. Weak opponent, jet lag, whatever.
4. Grade your paper with the actual results Monday morning.
When you complete these steps, you overcome selective memory...paper doesn't lie. You'll get a feel for when your projections are likely to be wrong, giving you more information in future weeks.
While we all learn from our experiences, we all do it at different speeds. If you have the proper processes in place, you'll be better able to identify both your successes and failures. With this information, achieving repeatable positive results becomes much easier.
Isn't that what you’re trying to do?
These ideas were found in Decision Traps, By Edward Russo & Paul Schoemaker, and adapted for your use in fantasy football.
Little kids do it all the time. Somehow they “forget” what you told them not to do hours before. Husbands somehow fail to hear their wives say: “Take out the garbage.” Girlfriends don’t recall that Wednesday night is poker night. Every week.
Our minds are slaves to our desires, and we choose to remember things better when it suits us. We all have the desire to think of ourselves as above average in all things, when that can’t possibly be the case.
“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
George Santayana
When our minds erase information that lowers our self-esteem, we cripple our ability to improve at activities. How can we learn from experience if we can’t trust our memory of events?
When it comes to decision-making our minds tend to give us too much credit for things that go right, while we bear almost none of the blame for things that go wrong. While I focus on how you can improve your fantasy football decisions in this article, the same theory applies to other aspects of life.
Delusions of Grandeur
We tend to think too much of our impact on random events. From knocking on wood, to lucky shirts, people feel the need to control life. When extremely good things happen to us, we tend to think we are solely responsible for our glory. For instance:
If you’ve got Kurt Warner on your team, you are nowhere near as smart as you think you are. Greg Jennings was not a lock to outscore Randy Moss this year. Random things happened, and we are where we are. Don’t pat yourself on the back so much.
The human mind is a funny thing: once we know something, it’s hard to imagine a world where it was unknown. People used to think the world was flat, and the center of the universe. Now we know better, and it’s hard to imagine a time where this information didn’t exist.
Once we saw Tom Brady’s record-breaking year, it was hard to call it anything other than inevitable. Where are all the people who were talking about Randy Moss becoming a cancer on the team?
Where are all the people who thought the Green Bay Packers’ offense couldn’t function without Brett Favre?
It’s not only good results that we process poorly, negative outcomes are misinterpreted by our brains as well.
Cry Me A River!
When we lose fantasy games we are keenly aware of all the outside factors that contributed to our defeat. Our star player got injured. We didn’t have enough time to prepare for the draft, and who could have predicted that the Cardinals would be doing so well anyway?
We just got unlucky. It wasn’t our fault, and we couldn’t have possibly foreseen what happened. Do any of these statements sound familiar?
Our brains are equipped with an ego defense mechanism that systematically shuts out information that lowers our self-esteem. This phenomenon when combined with our natural selective memory can make learning from experience extremely difficult. When we do well it was due to our genius and preparation. When we do poorly it was due to misfortune. How can we learn from experience if we won't give ourselves honest analysis of the facts?
Action Steps:
How can we conquer our own minds and learn from our experience faster than ever before? I've devised a quick worksheet that will force you to make a record of your predictions and your results. This five-minute exercise will tell you how your previous guesses have done. The first step towards making better guesses in the future.
1. Print out your lineup every week with the "projected stats" included.
2. Guess whether each player will score above or below his projection, and mark with an up or down arrow.
3. Write the reason for your guess. Weak opponent, jet lag, whatever.
4. Grade your paper with the actual results Monday morning.
When you complete these steps, you overcome selective memory...paper doesn't lie. You'll get a feel for when your projections are likely to be wrong, giving you more information in future weeks.
While we all learn from our experiences, we all do it at different speeds. If you have the proper processes in place, you'll be better able to identify both your successes and failures. With this information, achieving repeatable positive results becomes much easier.
Isn't that what you’re trying to do?
These ideas were found in Decision Traps, By Edward Russo & Paul Schoemaker, and adapted for your use in fantasy football.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Fantasy Football: Hedging Your Heart
Hedging is a term that gets bandied about often without much explanation. I thought I'd take a few minutes to discuss how we can use the concept to reduce risk in both fantasy football and our daily lives.
According to Answers.com, hedging is:
A "method of transferring Risk to permit the Risk Bearer to assume two offsetting positions at the same time so that, regardless of the outcome of an event, the risk bearer is left in a no win/no lose position..."
Well that's obscure.
Let's bring it into the real world for a minute. Let's say that you have a job driving trucks and a 401(k) plan. People save for a rainy day. We expect that at some point we aren't going to be able to produce enough money by working, so we squirrel away a little each year, so when the bad times come we're still OK. That's simple enough.
So there you are driving your truck and thinking, “How in the world should I invest my 401(k) money?” Most companies give you the option to buy either their stock or one of a variety of mutual funds. Lots of people choose company stock before thinking about what is likely to be going on in the event that they need the money.
We don't all make it 30 years with one company anymore. This is not our father's economy. Layoffs happen. Let me ask you a question: do you think your company stock will be performing particularly well in the event that you get laid off?
Not likely. So there you will be with no job and considerably less of a nest egg than you could have had if you'd chosen differently. You're a truck driver, so you know that your industry tends to do poorly when the price of oil is high, and well when the price of oil is low. Oil companies also tend to do well when the price of oil is high, and poorly when the price of oil is low.
What if you bought a mutual fund heavily weighted in oils stocks instead? Then in the event that you get laid off, your oil stocks will probably be setting new record highs. If your oil stocks are doing poorly, costs are low at your company and there's plenty of work.
That's hedging.
Making sure you're in pretty good shape no matter what happens.
Now let's take the concept over to fantasy football and see how it applies.
For years fantasy experts have been advising starting quarterback and wide receiver combos. The strategy is so widespread that often in drafts people will block your attempt to put together that Romo to T.O. connection.
Maybe we should start letting these connections happen more often. With superstar players who will both be must-starts every week, these owners will be forever tied to the fortunes of one team. Sure, it looks genius when it works, but if somebody gets hurt, your season is over.
Plus, going into the draft we are much less sure of how the season is going to look than we would ever let ourselves believe. Was anybody expecting the Colts’ offense to play as poorly as it has? Or the Cardinals to be playing so well?
How many quarterbacks got picked before Kurt Warner in your league? We don't know what's going to happen, and when we load up on just a few teams we leave ourselves at risk of being broke and unemployed.
If we spread our assets around the league we give ourselves a better chance of owning a piece of that surprise offense that is lighting up the league. We know that someone will surprise us every year—we just don't know who it will be.
Can’t Take The Pain?
We can extend the concept further to hedging our emotions. This year I drafted star players from two teams I dislike very much. At least if these hated franchises have good seasons, they'll take my fantasy football team along for the ride with them. I'll be sad that these teams I dislike are doing well, but I'll be happy to win my fantasy games week after week.
Compare that to the popular strategy of drafting all players from your favorite team. When they lose, you lose. You get to be miserable about two aspects of your football life.
Tony Romo and the Cowboys were making me very happy about football until the pinkie broke. Now I'm glad Romo was the only Cowboy on my team. You can still pick guys from your favorite squad—you just don't have to go overboard about it.
Hedging requires you to look into the future and make your best guess at what the world is going to look like if we get laid off, or if somebody breaks his finger. It requires us to plan on occasionally being surprised, and make our investments accordingly.
If you're able to make emotionless decisions in a world that is quick to panic and look forward while others analyze last week, the rewards will come.
According to Answers.com, hedging is:
A "method of transferring Risk to permit the Risk Bearer to assume two offsetting positions at the same time so that, regardless of the outcome of an event, the risk bearer is left in a no win/no lose position..."
Well that's obscure.
Let's bring it into the real world for a minute. Let's say that you have a job driving trucks and a 401(k) plan. People save for a rainy day. We expect that at some point we aren't going to be able to produce enough money by working, so we squirrel away a little each year, so when the bad times come we're still OK. That's simple enough.
So there you are driving your truck and thinking, “How in the world should I invest my 401(k) money?” Most companies give you the option to buy either their stock or one of a variety of mutual funds. Lots of people choose company stock before thinking about what is likely to be going on in the event that they need the money.
We don't all make it 30 years with one company anymore. This is not our father's economy. Layoffs happen. Let me ask you a question: do you think your company stock will be performing particularly well in the event that you get laid off?
Not likely. So there you will be with no job and considerably less of a nest egg than you could have had if you'd chosen differently. You're a truck driver, so you know that your industry tends to do poorly when the price of oil is high, and well when the price of oil is low. Oil companies also tend to do well when the price of oil is high, and poorly when the price of oil is low.
What if you bought a mutual fund heavily weighted in oils stocks instead? Then in the event that you get laid off, your oil stocks will probably be setting new record highs. If your oil stocks are doing poorly, costs are low at your company and there's plenty of work.
That's hedging.
Making sure you're in pretty good shape no matter what happens.
Now let's take the concept over to fantasy football and see how it applies.
For years fantasy experts have been advising starting quarterback and wide receiver combos. The strategy is so widespread that often in drafts people will block your attempt to put together that Romo to T.O. connection.
Maybe we should start letting these connections happen more often. With superstar players who will both be must-starts every week, these owners will be forever tied to the fortunes of one team. Sure, it looks genius when it works, but if somebody gets hurt, your season is over.
Plus, going into the draft we are much less sure of how the season is going to look than we would ever let ourselves believe. Was anybody expecting the Colts’ offense to play as poorly as it has? Or the Cardinals to be playing so well?
How many quarterbacks got picked before Kurt Warner in your league? We don't know what's going to happen, and when we load up on just a few teams we leave ourselves at risk of being broke and unemployed.
If we spread our assets around the league we give ourselves a better chance of owning a piece of that surprise offense that is lighting up the league. We know that someone will surprise us every year—we just don't know who it will be.
Can’t Take The Pain?
We can extend the concept further to hedging our emotions. This year I drafted star players from two teams I dislike very much. At least if these hated franchises have good seasons, they'll take my fantasy football team along for the ride with them. I'll be sad that these teams I dislike are doing well, but I'll be happy to win my fantasy games week after week.
Compare that to the popular strategy of drafting all players from your favorite team. When they lose, you lose. You get to be miserable about two aspects of your football life.
Tony Romo and the Cowboys were making me very happy about football until the pinkie broke. Now I'm glad Romo was the only Cowboy on my team. You can still pick guys from your favorite squad—you just don't have to go overboard about it.
Hedging requires you to look into the future and make your best guess at what the world is going to look like if we get laid off, or if somebody breaks his finger. It requires us to plan on occasionally being surprised, and make our investments accordingly.
If you're able to make emotionless decisions in a world that is quick to panic and look forward while others analyze last week, the rewards will come.
Monday, October 20, 2008
NFL: Underlying Racism in Celebration Rules?
Touchdown celebrations go back for decades. Frank Gifford and Paul Hourning threw balls into the stands when they scored.1965, and Homer Jones gave us the spike. In 1974 the Hoston Oilers drafted Billy "White Shoes" Johnson. He was 5'9" from division three Widner University, and when he scored he liked to dance. After returning a punt for a touchdown he did an odd version of the "funky chicken" to the delight of fans.
Dancing wasn't done at that time in the NFL. White Shoes thought he was going to get a tongue lashing when he want to the sideline, but head coach Bum Phillips (Wade Phillips' dad) was OK with it. "You keep scoring and you can dance all you want." Phillips reportedly said when Billy returned to the sideline.
Players started coming up with more entertaining ways to celebrate a score. In 1982 the "Fun Bunch" of the Washington Redskins would get together in a circle and high five each other.
Mark Gastineau made the "Sack Dance" famous.
Growing wearing of expressed happiness, the NFL instituted a rule in 1984 prohibiting any "any prolonged, excessive, or premeditated celebration by individual players or a group of players."
When an organization tries to regulate something like exuberance, they have to make vague rules like this one. They need the ability to punish any activity they see fit, as they are acting as judge and jury for "sportsmanlike behavior."
Every celebration could be considered prolonged and excessive. The great thing about people is we have a tendency to simply ignore bad rules. The 1984 rule was largely ignored by players, it's a good thing too, or we might have never gotten to see the "Icky Shuffle."
1993 gave us the Lambeau leap, now one of the greatest traditions in football. If players had followed the rules that were on the books, it would have never existed. How sad would that be?
From the "Mile High Salute" to the "Dirty Bird" we all have fun with celebrations, so why in the world does the NFL hate them so much?
Terrell Owens is one reason. Terrell Owens' antics are now legendary, to list them would be redundant.
Chad Ochocinqo is public enemy number two in the NFL's eyes. The league office couldn't even see the humor in a sign that said "Please don't fine me again!"
What about the uproar that Randy Moss' mock moon caused? You would have thought he whipped out his you know what, and waved it at the cheer leading squad for all the fuss people were making.
Do these guys have anything in common? Can we confront the pink elephant in the room and talk about racism for a minute?
Post World War II NFL owners didn't see fit to hire a black head coach until Art Shell was hired to coach the Oakland Raiders by Al Davis in 1989.
For a long time it was thought that African Americans didn't have the mental capacity to handle the complexities of the quarterback position. Despite all scientific evidence to the contrary, African Americans were steered away from this position until the late 1980s. Some would argue this practice continues today.
Is it possible that the Owners are imposing their cultural ideals on the league? Their history suggests a less than open minded view.
In 2003 Joe Horn made an imaginary phone call from the end zone and the Owners decided to act...again. A 2004 rule change stated that in addition to fines, "flamboyant" celebrations would incur automatic 15 yard penalties. The "Lambeau Leap" was specifically excepted from this rule. "The Leap" was in direct conflict with the 1984 rule, and has now become an endeared tradition.
Why is the NFL penalizing the people who will create the traditions of the future? If not cultural bias, what forces were at work in coming to this decision?
The specific use of the word flamboyant stinks of xenophobia. Homophobes use this word to describe behavior that makes them feel uncomfortable. Their discomfort comes entirely from their closed minded position on the rights of others. Why not disallow the discomfort rather than the behavior that caused it?
Flamboyance cannot be objectively measured. What one person thinks is over the line, another will find amusing. Why must we all be held to the standards of the most up tight people around us? Why should we coddle these fear based emotions?
Flamboyance is in the eye of the beholder. The NFL chose to implement a rule that every referee will interpret differently, and decreased the fairness of the outcomes of the games. Ironically they did this in the name of sportsmanship.
In 2006, because the NFL was still not happy with the antics of some of its players the celebration rule was changed again. Fortunately for us players have kept on ignoring it.
"Individual players are prohibited from using foreign objects or the football while celebrating. They are also prohibited from engaging in any celebrations while on the ground. A celebration shall be deemed excessive or prolonged if a player continues to celebrate after a warning from an official. Previously, players were not prohibited from using props or celebrating on the ground."
At least in this rule a prolonged celebration is defined. Prohibiting players from celebrating while on the ground seems silly...must they jump in the air and display their glee only during their hang time?
Or was this clause put in specifically to target Terrell Owens for his celebration where he pretended to sleep? T.O broke both parts of the new rule, he used the ball as a pillow. Is this celebration really more offensive than the "Lambeau Leap"?
The rules to limit celebration are at best silly and arbitrary, and at worst racist and xenophobic. It's not surprising in the least that players and owners are at odds over this issue. The players and the owners have had very different life experiences. This isn't going to be the only issue on which the differ culturally.
The NFL is in the entertainment business, yet they penalize their showmen. The league hides behind the notion of sportsmanship, as if they have divine inspiration about what a perfect athlete looks like, and how he behaves.
African Americans clearly have a different view of "flamboyant" behavior than Anglo-Americans. One group of people wrote laws to outlaw dancing, for the other dance is deeply rooted in culture that pre-dates our arrival on this continent.
To assume that the Anglo definition is any more valid than the African is racist on it's face. The fact that the whites own the teams does not give them the right to impose their culture on the blacks who work in their fields.
In 1933 the NFL prohibited African Americans from playing in the league, today 70% of NFL players are black. Before 1984 no celebration rules existed in the game, as the number of African Americans increased, so has the regulation on celebrations.
With all the evidence that is in place we must consider the possibility that these rules are nothing more than watered down Jim Crow regulations, designed to keep African American athletes in their place.
Sunday, October 19, 2008
NFL: What Is Parity? Why Does It Occur?
Lots of experts talk about parity every week...but they seldom describe it. This article examines what parity is, and talks about the reasons it occurs.
If we're going to talk about parity in the NFL we must first define it. Perfect parity would be a season in which all 32 teams posted an 8-8 record.
From the salary cap to the draft order, the league has several rules in place that promote parity. Do these rules actually accomplish their goals? Or are there outside forces that contribute to different teams doing well each year?
Most of our evidence of parity is anecdotal. We remember the Colts starting undefeated so many years in a row. We remember the Patriots undefeated regular season last year. These things stick out in our minds, but are they an accurate interpretation of what's going on?
Currently, the only undefeated team left is the Tennessee Titans, and we have a feeling they aren't going to go 16-0.
To gain an objective view of parity I examined the standard deviation of wins since the year 2000. Standard deviation is a mathematical measure of volatility. The higher the standard deviation, the more volatility there is in the data. The higher the volatility of wins, the farther we get from that perfect 8-8 season. Here's what I found:
Year Vol/Wins
2008: 1.31
2007: 3.32
2006: 3.12
2005: 3.39
2004: 3.08
2003: 3.07
2002: 2.62
2001: 3.26
2000: 3.15
As you can see, win volatility has stayed in a tight range this century. 2002 stands out as the league parity was greatest. In 2002 the best regular season record was 12-4, no AFC teams won more than 11 games that year. That's parity.
Before I ran the numbers I thought that 2007 would be where parity was noticed the least, but I was wrong. 2005 saw the Pittsburgh Steelers win 15 games, the Patriots 14 and the Eagles 13. This data shows us how untrustworthy our memories are. We tend to remember the outlying results too often, and this skews our perception of the facts.
So far in 2008 the volatility of wins is 1.31. I fully expect this number to go up as the season progresses, but it does look like we're having a year that is closer to 2002 than 2005.
Another way we can examine league parity is by the amount of turnover in post season teams. If I were the commissioner of the NFL this would be the measure I would be most concerned with. If the same teams keep making the playoffs every year, general interest in football will decrease. (Assuming all other factors are kept equal.)
Twelve NFL teams make the playoffs each year. Since the year 2000 at least five teams that made the playoffs failed to qualify for the post season in the following year. With almost half of the post season teams changing over every year, it appears that parity has always existed...this year is nothing special.
What causes parity?
In addition to league rules designed to promote the phenomenon, there are some randomizing factors inherent in football that make it hard to enter the post season year in and year out.
With the regular season being only 16 games, the "long run" never really has a chance to play out in the NFL. Turnovers have a tremendous effect on wins and losses, and these events are largely random.
Turnovers:
While offensive line play and quarterback experience have a large impact on turnovers, sometimes players just drop the ball. Once the ball is on the ground luck plays a major role in who ends up with possession. Luck, therefore, could have a major impact on teams returning to the playoffs.
Injuries:
Injuries are the greatest randomizer in football. Nobody can predict injuries, and when they happen their effects on the probability of victory are too large to be ignored.
You'd have to be particularly obtuse to not be able to see the effect that Tom Brady's injury had on the football season this year. This is an extreme case, but the effects of injuries are vast:
Seattle's wide receiver injuries are a large reason for their 1-4 start.
The Eagles fortunes are tied to the health of Donovan McNabb and Brian Westbrook.
Tony Romo's pinkie injury changed the odds of Dallas making the postseason tremendously.
The list goes on and on.
Conclusions:
From the data we've examined today we can see that this year more teams have a chance of making the playoffs than in years past. Parity is on pace to be the greatest in this season than it has this century.
Turnovers are somewhat random, and very important for winning games. We know that players will get hurt every year, but we don't know which players. Therefore luck plays a major factor in every NFL season. These randomizing effects probably have a greater impact on league parity than all of Roger Goddell's rules combined.
If we're going to talk about parity in the NFL we must first define it. Perfect parity would be a season in which all 32 teams posted an 8-8 record.
From the salary cap to the draft order, the league has several rules in place that promote parity. Do these rules actually accomplish their goals? Or are there outside forces that contribute to different teams doing well each year?
Most of our evidence of parity is anecdotal. We remember the Colts starting undefeated so many years in a row. We remember the Patriots undefeated regular season last year. These things stick out in our minds, but are they an accurate interpretation of what's going on?
Currently, the only undefeated team left is the Tennessee Titans, and we have a feeling they aren't going to go 16-0.
To gain an objective view of parity I examined the standard deviation of wins since the year 2000. Standard deviation is a mathematical measure of volatility. The higher the standard deviation, the more volatility there is in the data. The higher the volatility of wins, the farther we get from that perfect 8-8 season. Here's what I found:
Year Vol/Wins
2008: 1.31
2007: 3.32
2006: 3.12
2005: 3.39
2004: 3.08
2003: 3.07
2002: 2.62
2001: 3.26
2000: 3.15
As you can see, win volatility has stayed in a tight range this century. 2002 stands out as the league parity was greatest. In 2002 the best regular season record was 12-4, no AFC teams won more than 11 games that year. That's parity.
Before I ran the numbers I thought that 2007 would be where parity was noticed the least, but I was wrong. 2005 saw the Pittsburgh Steelers win 15 games, the Patriots 14 and the Eagles 13. This data shows us how untrustworthy our memories are. We tend to remember the outlying results too often, and this skews our perception of the facts.
So far in 2008 the volatility of wins is 1.31. I fully expect this number to go up as the season progresses, but it does look like we're having a year that is closer to 2002 than 2005.
Another way we can examine league parity is by the amount of turnover in post season teams. If I were the commissioner of the NFL this would be the measure I would be most concerned with. If the same teams keep making the playoffs every year, general interest in football will decrease. (Assuming all other factors are kept equal.)
Twelve NFL teams make the playoffs each year. Since the year 2000 at least five teams that made the playoffs failed to qualify for the post season in the following year. With almost half of the post season teams changing over every year, it appears that parity has always existed...this year is nothing special.
What causes parity?
In addition to league rules designed to promote the phenomenon, there are some randomizing factors inherent in football that make it hard to enter the post season year in and year out.
With the regular season being only 16 games, the "long run" never really has a chance to play out in the NFL. Turnovers have a tremendous effect on wins and losses, and these events are largely random.
Turnovers:
While offensive line play and quarterback experience have a large impact on turnovers, sometimes players just drop the ball. Once the ball is on the ground luck plays a major role in who ends up with possession. Luck, therefore, could have a major impact on teams returning to the playoffs.
Injuries:
Injuries are the greatest randomizer in football. Nobody can predict injuries, and when they happen their effects on the probability of victory are too large to be ignored.
You'd have to be particularly obtuse to not be able to see the effect that Tom Brady's injury had on the football season this year. This is an extreme case, but the effects of injuries are vast:
Seattle's wide receiver injuries are a large reason for their 1-4 start.
The Eagles fortunes are tied to the health of Donovan McNabb and Brian Westbrook.
Tony Romo's pinkie injury changed the odds of Dallas making the postseason tremendously.
The list goes on and on.
Conclusions:
From the data we've examined today we can see that this year more teams have a chance of making the playoffs than in years past. Parity is on pace to be the greatest in this season than it has this century.
Turnovers are somewhat random, and very important for winning games. We know that players will get hurt every year, but we don't know which players. Therefore luck plays a major factor in every NFL season. These randomizing effects probably have a greater impact on league parity than all of Roger Goddell's rules combined.
Friday, October 17, 2008
Fantasy: Broke Models Need You
Sorry to disappoint- this isn't that kind of article. Get your minds out of the gutter and back on fantasy football.
Fantasy football player values are unknown. In every discipline, from biology to economics, we build models to predict unknown values. Then we hope they work.
You just have to Google “fantasy football” and you'll get a long list of sites with models that predict future fantasy football points. They've been created by clever—and not so clever people to sell advertising space that you'll mostly ignore.
They're all wrong. But pick one anyway. CBS Sportsline will do well enough in a pinch. The model that you use matters much less than how you use your model.
All of the fantasy projections are far too dependent on statistics. Some are too dependent on last year’s statistics, others are too dependent on this year’s statistics—but all are based on running stats through some formula.
Statistics lie. Consider this stat line from last week's Jacksonville- Denver game:
REC YDS TD FAN
Nate Jackson TE (DEN) 0 0 0 0
Goose eggs. That isn't the whole story—if you watched the game, you know that Nate Jackson dropped a pass in the end zone. One catch for three yards and a touchdown is a pretty good day for a tight end.
If Jackson is an end zone target for the Denver Broncos, most models aren't going to price that correctly, they’ll just see the zeroes.
Models also handle injuries very poorly. They tend to under-value the negative impact on the players around the injury. I think the models anchor themselves to their previous projection.
So if both the projections and human beings tend to make this mistake, you may find opportunity by trading away players on teams that have a newly injured player.
All the Dallas Cowboys players went down sharply in value on Monday when we first heard about the pinkie, rebounded Tuesday with the Roy Williams signing, and rebounded further with Romo maybe playing hurt.
How much? I don't know, but I can tell you which direction they moved in. Sometimes that's all you need.
If you're more aware of the current events changing the marketplace than your opponent, you should be able to create value for yourself both in trades and on the waiver wire.
Know when your model is broken, and you'll make better decisions.
Edited By Matt Gilmartin
Fantasy football player values are unknown. In every discipline, from biology to economics, we build models to predict unknown values. Then we hope they work.
You just have to Google “fantasy football” and you'll get a long list of sites with models that predict future fantasy football points. They've been created by clever—and not so clever people to sell advertising space that you'll mostly ignore.
They're all wrong. But pick one anyway. CBS Sportsline will do well enough in a pinch. The model that you use matters much less than how you use your model.
All of the fantasy projections are far too dependent on statistics. Some are too dependent on last year’s statistics, others are too dependent on this year’s statistics—but all are based on running stats through some formula.
Statistics lie. Consider this stat line from last week's Jacksonville- Denver game:
REC YDS TD FAN
Nate Jackson TE (DEN) 0 0 0 0
Goose eggs. That isn't the whole story—if you watched the game, you know that Nate Jackson dropped a pass in the end zone. One catch for three yards and a touchdown is a pretty good day for a tight end.
If Jackson is an end zone target for the Denver Broncos, most models aren't going to price that correctly, they’ll just see the zeroes.
Models also handle injuries very poorly. They tend to under-value the negative impact on the players around the injury. I think the models anchor themselves to their previous projection.
So if both the projections and human beings tend to make this mistake, you may find opportunity by trading away players on teams that have a newly injured player.
All the Dallas Cowboys players went down sharply in value on Monday when we first heard about the pinkie, rebounded Tuesday with the Roy Williams signing, and rebounded further with Romo maybe playing hurt.
How much? I don't know, but I can tell you which direction they moved in. Sometimes that's all you need.
If you're more aware of the current events changing the marketplace than your opponent, you should be able to create value for yourself both in trades and on the waiver wire.
Know when your model is broken, and you'll make better decisions.
Edited By Matt Gilmartin
Fantasy: Negotiate The Trade Deadline
Due to the recent passing of the NFL trade deadline, and the fact that the deadline for most fantasy leagues is quickly approaching, I thought I'd share some thoughts on how to negotiate and analyze trades.
If you apply these skills, you'll make better deals for your fantasy team, and you might save a few bucks at the car dealership, too.
Information is power:
When you walk onto a new-car lot, don't you want to know how much the dealer paid for the car? Salespeople will often try to trap customers into talking about monthly payments.
You'll hear the question "How much can you afford to pay a month?" Never answer this question. It's irrelevant to the price of the car. Why negotiate down from the maximum that you could possibly spend, when you can negotiate up from the minimum that they would take for the car?
Therefore, I cannot express the importance of talking fantasy football with the other players in your league enough. This is how you find out their "dealer invoice" on fantasy players.
Each individual owner has their own method for valuing players. It's important that you know what the other owners think of their players and yours, and the fastest way to find this out is by talking to them.
Talk to them on Monday mornings. We are emotional about our fantasy football teams, and no matter the result, do you know any emotional people who don't like to talk? Ask the question "So how do you like your team these days?"
Owners will tell you their problems. Then it's up to you to devise a trade that solves their problems for them. The best listener, not the best talker, almost always wins negotiations.
Have A Plan:
It's important to develop a system for judging what impact any trade is going to make on your team. The question you are trying to answer is: “How many more points am I likely to score per week if I make this move?”
The first thing I consider is the impact on my starting lineup. What weapons am I going to choose to deploy if I have this new roster?
Look at some projections, but be careful to apply common sense. The computer models don't always take the latest news into account.
Know Your Needs:
Because your lineup points are the only ones you get to keep, my favorite trade to make is trading away depth at one position for a significant upgrade in talent at another.
For instance, on my team I have Plaxico Burress, Brandon Stokely, Marques Colston and Anquan Boldin…far too much talent for a league that starts only two wide receivers.
The Wildcat offense in Miami is giving Ronnie Brown 15 touches per game at quarterback. Plus all the hand-offs he'll likely get. Because his touches are being built into the game plan, he's going to score consistently more points than most other running backs. He could even have five touchdown passes this year. Why not trade two wide receivers I don't need for a running back stud?
My overall roster score will go down, but my starting line-up score will go up.
Conclusions:
If you know what other owners think of their players and yours, you’ll find expected value in more of your transactions. Visualizing the impact on your future line-up will also help your decision making process. After all, if you don’t know what you want, you’ll never learn how to get it.
Happy Trading!
Edited By Matt Gilmartin
Image license can be found here
If you apply these skills, you'll make better deals for your fantasy team, and you might save a few bucks at the car dealership, too.
Information is power:
When you walk onto a new-car lot, don't you want to know how much the dealer paid for the car? Salespeople will often try to trap customers into talking about monthly payments.
You'll hear the question "How much can you afford to pay a month?" Never answer this question. It's irrelevant to the price of the car. Why negotiate down from the maximum that you could possibly spend, when you can negotiate up from the minimum that they would take for the car?
Therefore, I cannot express the importance of talking fantasy football with the other players in your league enough. This is how you find out their "dealer invoice" on fantasy players.
Each individual owner has their own method for valuing players. It's important that you know what the other owners think of their players and yours, and the fastest way to find this out is by talking to them.
Talk to them on Monday mornings. We are emotional about our fantasy football teams, and no matter the result, do you know any emotional people who don't like to talk? Ask the question "So how do you like your team these days?"
Owners will tell you their problems. Then it's up to you to devise a trade that solves their problems for them. The best listener, not the best talker, almost always wins negotiations.
Have A Plan:
It's important to develop a system for judging what impact any trade is going to make on your team. The question you are trying to answer is: “How many more points am I likely to score per week if I make this move?”
The first thing I consider is the impact on my starting lineup. What weapons am I going to choose to deploy if I have this new roster?
Look at some projections, but be careful to apply common sense. The computer models don't always take the latest news into account.
Know Your Needs:
Because your lineup points are the only ones you get to keep, my favorite trade to make is trading away depth at one position for a significant upgrade in talent at another.
For instance, on my team I have Plaxico Burress, Brandon Stokely, Marques Colston and Anquan Boldin…far too much talent for a league that starts only two wide receivers.
The Wildcat offense in Miami is giving Ronnie Brown 15 touches per game at quarterback. Plus all the hand-offs he'll likely get. Because his touches are being built into the game plan, he's going to score consistently more points than most other running backs. He could even have five touchdown passes this year. Why not trade two wide receivers I don't need for a running back stud?
My overall roster score will go down, but my starting line-up score will go up.
Conclusions:
If you know what other owners think of their players and yours, you’ll find expected value in more of your transactions. Visualizing the impact on your future line-up will also help your decision making process. After all, if you don’t know what you want, you’ll never learn how to get it.
Happy Trading!
Edited By Matt Gilmartin
Image license can be found here
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Dallas Cowboys: The Roy Williams Impact.
Roy Williams, the standout from the University of Texas will be returning home to join the Dallas Cowboys. At 6' 3" 211 pounds, Williams is a large target with breakaway speed. His addition to the Cowboys will have a major impact on the offense, as defenses adjust their strategies to the new threat in Irving Texas.
Going forward the Cowboys will have a legitimate deep threat on each side. This is going to cause defenses to play more zone coverages. Two deep zone coverages give deep responsibilities to the safeties on each side, while the middle of the field becomes the responsibility of the middle line backer.
The two deep zone is vulnerable to attack in the deep middle of the field. Balls thrown by Brad Johnson over the middle linebacker's head will be more likely to find targets Jason Witten and Patrick Crayton. Crayton, who spent most of last season as a slot receiver, will likely move back to this role, as Williams assumes one of the less academically demanding roles at wide out.
Opponents will be less likely to play eight man fronts against the new look Cowboys. With eight men in the box, that leaves two corners and a safety covering Owens and Williams...danger Will Robinson.
All Dallas running backs should benefit from this change in scheming. Marion Barber should almost never see a safety near the line of scrimmage. This should improve his yards per carry average.
Tony Romo has always shown himself to be a likable guy. Most people think that if can get along with T. O you can get along with anyone. He should work well with Williams. Williams, after spending so much time in Detroit purgatory, should be eager to learn Jason Garrets offense. The two should work well together.
The only possible negative impact of Williams' presence will be on the attitude of Terrell Owens. Owens likes the ball, but he loves to win. If the Cowboys play well Owens should not be a problem.
All together the Cowboys are going to be much harder to beat with Williams on the club. Look for them to do extremely well when Romo returns from his injury.
In a two deep coverage the safties offer protection to the quarterback
Brad Johnson/Tony Romo.
T.O/Crayton
Witten !
Going forward the Cowboys will have a legitimate deep threat on each side. This is going to cause defenses to play more zone coverages. Two deep zone coverages give deep responsibilities to the safeties on each side, while the middle of the field becomes the responsibility of the middle line backer.
The two deep zone is vulnerable to attack in the deep middle of the field. Balls thrown by Brad Johnson over the middle linebacker's head will be more likely to find targets Jason Witten and Patrick Crayton. Crayton, who spent most of last season as a slot receiver, will likely move back to this role, as Williams assumes one of the less academically demanding roles at wide out.
Opponents will be less likely to play eight man fronts against the new look Cowboys. With eight men in the box, that leaves two corners and a safety covering Owens and Williams...danger Will Robinson.
All Dallas running backs should benefit from this change in scheming. Marion Barber should almost never see a safety near the line of scrimmage. This should improve his yards per carry average.
Tony Romo has always shown himself to be a likable guy. Most people think that if can get along with T. O you can get along with anyone. He should work well with Williams. Williams, after spending so much time in Detroit purgatory, should be eager to learn Jason Garrets offense. The two should work well together.
The only possible negative impact of Williams' presence will be on the attitude of Terrell Owens. Owens likes the ball, but he loves to win. If the Cowboys play well Owens should not be a problem.
All together the Cowboys are going to be much harder to beat with Williams on the club. Look for them to do extremely well when Romo returns from his injury.
In a two deep coverage the safties offer protection to the quarterback
Brad Johnson/Tony Romo.
T.O/Crayton
Witten !
Fantasy Football: Negotiating The Trade Deadline
The trade deadline is fast approaching in most leagues, and owners are scrambling to make last minute deals to strengthen their teams. Maybe somebody just offered you a batch of players for your stud. Maybe you want to unload a player with name value for somebody who's doing it now. Odds are you could use a brush up in the art of negotiaion.
It doesn't matter if you're trying to convince your kids to do their homework, or convincing someone that Chad Johnson is going to have a great second half of the season, a sales presentation is a sales presenatation.
Zig Ziglar's Secrets of Closing the Sale is a must read for anyone who's ever tried to convince anyone to do anything.
This piece takes three sales concepts, and translates them to the realm of fantasy football. No matter what your product every salesman must build value, and overcome objections before he can close the deal.
Intro.
In sales when you first meet a client there is a certain amount of small talk that must be executed before business can be discussed. Most of us have a relationship with the owners in our fantasy leagues. We'll talk about our kids, or homework. Maybe our kid's homework. Then we mention fantasy football and we talk about our teams. What going well? What's going poorly?
This small talk can't be ignored. An old sales manager of mine used to tel me: "People will always let you know how to close them, you just have to listen to what they're saying."
Ask open ended questions about what they feel like they need on their team. Who are their favorite players? Listen to what they tell you about their wants and needs, you are going to need to touch on these things in the meat of your pitch.
Value Build.
The value build is the easiest part of any sales presentation. If you've heard your prospect, you know what they want to hear. This is when you start to take control of the conversation. Your open ended questions become closed ended questions.
What do you think about your wide recievers? is an open ended question You think Chad Johnson is going break out soon, don't you? Is a closed ended question. The prospect has two choices, yes or no - and to avoid conflict he must say yes. People love to avoid conflict.
You use these questions to strategicly make your thoughts come out of your targets mouth. If you put a phrase like "Wouldn't you say" before your statement people often agree just because it sounds like the easier option.
String together questions like this until yo have made your point, while also making it sound like it was your prospect's idea.
At this point you want to test close. Ask a series of questions to which you already know the answer, followed by one to which you hope the answer is yes.
i.e
YOu: "So you're sick of LT and his big toe right?"
P: Yeah
You: And you're crazy deep at running back right?
P: Yeah, I keep benching guys who score waiting on him to turn around.
You: You're receivers are pretty bad, aren't they. Like Ocho-Stinko.
P:
Objections.
Close.
It doesn't matter if you're trying to convince your kids to do their homework, or convincing someone that Chad Johnson is going to have a great second half of the season, a sales presentation is a sales presenatation.
Zig Ziglar's Secrets of Closing the Sale is a must read for anyone who's ever tried to convince anyone to do anything.
This piece takes three sales concepts, and translates them to the realm of fantasy football. No matter what your product every salesman must build value, and overcome objections before he can close the deal.
Intro.
In sales when you first meet a client there is a certain amount of small talk that must be executed before business can be discussed. Most of us have a relationship with the owners in our fantasy leagues. We'll talk about our kids, or homework. Maybe our kid's homework. Then we mention fantasy football and we talk about our teams. What going well? What's going poorly?
This small talk can't be ignored. An old sales manager of mine used to tel me: "People will always let you know how to close them, you just have to listen to what they're saying."
Ask open ended questions about what they feel like they need on their team. Who are their favorite players? Listen to what they tell you about their wants and needs, you are going to need to touch on these things in the meat of your pitch.
Value Build.
The value build is the easiest part of any sales presentation. If you've heard your prospect, you know what they want to hear. This is when you start to take control of the conversation. Your open ended questions become closed ended questions.
What do you think about your wide recievers? is an open ended question You think Chad Johnson is going break out soon, don't you? Is a closed ended question. The prospect has two choices, yes or no - and to avoid conflict he must say yes. People love to avoid conflict.
You use these questions to strategicly make your thoughts come out of your targets mouth. If you put a phrase like "Wouldn't you say" before your statement people often agree just because it sounds like the easier option.
String together questions like this until yo have made your point, while also making it sound like it was your prospect's idea.
At this point you want to test close. Ask a series of questions to which you already know the answer, followed by one to which you hope the answer is yes.
i.e
YOu: "So you're sick of LT and his big toe right?"
P: Yeah
You: And you're crazy deep at running back right?
P: Yeah, I keep benching guys who score waiting on him to turn around.
You: You're receivers are pretty bad, aren't they. Like Ocho-Stinko.
P:
Objections.
Close.
Saturday, October 11, 2008
Fantasy Football: Drop Anchor And Win
Fantasy football is a game. All the football knowledge in the world isn't going to help you win unless you are willing to improve your game playing skills. Human beings tend to process information in similar ways, and as such are prone to making similar mistakes.
While we all have heard the advice "Never judge a book by it's cover." The truth of the matter is we do this every day. We decide based on first impressions.
Ever decided not to hire a guy because he was five minutes late for a meeting? Or crossed the street to avoid having to talk to someone? Maybe left a bar because you got a bad vibe from the patrons?
These feelings are natural, but they don't always lead to the best decisions. What's worse is we humans tend to hold on to these first impressions, despite all subsequent evidence to the contrary. This phenomenon is called anchoring by modern decision theorists.
In business anchoring causes us to hire and promote the wrong people. In fantasy football the phenomenon causes owners to keep the wrong players on their rosters, because before the season started there were high hopes for these player's numbers.
This article examines a real world fantasy football example where anchoring is effecting the decision making of vast numbers of owners. If you can free your mind from these chains, you can score more points over time than most of your competitors.
Laurence Maroney (RB) New England Patriots
Before the season started, Laurence Maroney was expected to be the feature back on the highest scoring offense in the league. Maroney was a standout in the second half of last season, and the Patriots were returning most of their record breaking offense.
We all know what happened to Tom Brady in week one. After five weeks of play, we can be assured that this Patriots team isn't going to score very many points.
Maroney is far from featured on this low scoring team. He shares carries with Sammy Morris, Kevin Faulk, and LaMont Jordan.
According to a popular fantasy site, Maroney is owned in 69% of leagues. More than both Michael Pittman (37%), and Tim Hightower (39%). Pittman and Higtower are the established short yardage backs on the third and fifth highest scoring offenses in the NFL.
The Broncos are averaging 29.8 points per game this year, the Cardinals 29.4. The Partiots are scoring only 19.8 points per game, yet the marriage to Maroney continues in most leagues.
Making It Worse:
In a recent Washington Post article, a political study was conducted on how likely people are to change their minds. The Yale University study showed that after people are shown facts that refute their opinion, for most people these opinions become more strongly held than before.
The political scientists concluded that when people's beliefs are contradicted by facts, most human beings argue back in their own minds, twisting their perceptions until they come to their originally held conclusion.
What Should I Do?
Take an honest look at your roster, and look for players who do the same job on higher scoring teams. Unless you have a football reason for thinking your player is going to bounce back, he probably isn't.
Pick up some guys who are doing it now. If you make the proper adjustments mid season you can make up for a multitude of draft day errors, but you must first let go of your draft day assumptions. You must be willing to change your mind in the face of new facts.
If you are aware of the mistakes that human beings are predisposed towards making, you'll make better decisions in both fantasy football and life.
Anchors away!
While we all have heard the advice "Never judge a book by it's cover." The truth of the matter is we do this every day. We decide based on first impressions.
Ever decided not to hire a guy because he was five minutes late for a meeting? Or crossed the street to avoid having to talk to someone? Maybe left a bar because you got a bad vibe from the patrons?
These feelings are natural, but they don't always lead to the best decisions. What's worse is we humans tend to hold on to these first impressions, despite all subsequent evidence to the contrary. This phenomenon is called anchoring by modern decision theorists.
In business anchoring causes us to hire and promote the wrong people. In fantasy football the phenomenon causes owners to keep the wrong players on their rosters, because before the season started there were high hopes for these player's numbers.
This article examines a real world fantasy football example where anchoring is effecting the decision making of vast numbers of owners. If you can free your mind from these chains, you can score more points over time than most of your competitors.
Laurence Maroney (RB) New England Patriots
Before the season started, Laurence Maroney was expected to be the feature back on the highest scoring offense in the league. Maroney was a standout in the second half of last season, and the Patriots were returning most of their record breaking offense.
We all know what happened to Tom Brady in week one. After five weeks of play, we can be assured that this Patriots team isn't going to score very many points.
Maroney is far from featured on this low scoring team. He shares carries with Sammy Morris, Kevin Faulk, and LaMont Jordan.
According to a popular fantasy site, Maroney is owned in 69% of leagues. More than both Michael Pittman (37%), and Tim Hightower (39%). Pittman and Higtower are the established short yardage backs on the third and fifth highest scoring offenses in the NFL.
The Broncos are averaging 29.8 points per game this year, the Cardinals 29.4. The Partiots are scoring only 19.8 points per game, yet the marriage to Maroney continues in most leagues.
Making It Worse:
In a recent Washington Post article, a political study was conducted on how likely people are to change their minds. The Yale University study showed that after people are shown facts that refute their opinion, for most people these opinions become more strongly held than before.
The political scientists concluded that when people's beliefs are contradicted by facts, most human beings argue back in their own minds, twisting their perceptions until they come to their originally held conclusion.
What Should I Do?
Take an honest look at your roster, and look for players who do the same job on higher scoring teams. Unless you have a football reason for thinking your player is going to bounce back, he probably isn't.
Pick up some guys who are doing it now. If you make the proper adjustments mid season you can make up for a multitude of draft day errors, but you must first let go of your draft day assumptions. You must be willing to change your mind in the face of new facts.
If you are aware of the mistakes that human beings are predisposed towards making, you'll make better decisions in both fantasy football and life.
Anchors away!
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Seahawks: Bleakness In Seattle
Something special happened in Seattle after last weeks game in New York. People stopped talking about the Seahawks. Oh we still communicate about our hometown boys, we just do it with grunt, eye rolls, and shaking heads. This season people don't even want to say the word Seahawks. Conversations sound like this:
"Ugh, dude -did you see it?"
"I turned it off at halftime."
"I got some laundry done at least."
The good news is the Seahawks can't possibly be as bad as they appeared to be on Sunday. It must be that jet-lag east coast effect on crack or something. They can't be that bad.
The Seahawks have good reason to think they will get better offensively. The wider receivers will heal, and practice with Matt Hasselbeck. Not this week, but they will eventually. Things will get better...someday.
Defensively, there may be a systemic problem. After giving up 523 yards of total offense last sunday can we all say out loud together:
WE MISS RAY RHODES!!!
Since Ray Rhodes was hired as defensive co-ordinator in 2003 the Seahawks unit has outperformed it's talent level. Since his stoke in 2005 he's been forced to be an assistant for health reasons.
This past off season Rhodes was hired as the Houston Texan's defensive backs assistant. The Seahawks, who returned eleven starters, can't stop anybody. Cause and effect?
Leroy Hill was quoted recently saying the defense "has lost it's swagger."
The swagger isn't lost it lives in Houston now.
As recently as September Ray was hospitalized, experiencing dizzyness. My best wishes go out to this most beautiful of defensive minds.
We miss you so much Ray. Please get better soon, football can't afford to lose you.
The Seahawks defense needs to start playing for Ray. Make your old coach proud, he deserves it.
Dallas Cowboys: Three Football Problems
The Dallas Cowboys are favored by Las Vegas odds makers and several football pundits to win the Lombardi Trophy this year. But before Jerry Jones can start making room in his trophy case, Wade Phillips is going to need to address some key issues on his football team.
We can, and will, talk until we are blue in the face about the emotional status of Terrell Owens. We can plan Tony and Jessica's wedding and honeymoon...if we're lucky we'll even get some footage. These things are distractions.
If the Cowboys want to win in January they will need to do three things: take better care of the football, run the ball consistently, and make more plays in the defensive backfield.
Butterfingers:
The Cowboys have fumbled the football nine times this season. That's more than Detroit (6) and Houston (8). The Cowboys are tied with the terrible Bengals in this statistic. Tony Romo isn't doing the team any favors by averaging over one interception per game on top of that.
The Cowboys have enough offensive firepower to overcome turnovers, but that's no reason for them to try to lead the league in fumbles and win the Superbowl in the same year. Choose a goal.
Cowboys fans know all too well how costly fumbles in January can be. Work on the problem now please Mr. Phillips.
Stuffed:
When the Cowboys have run the ball well this year they have looked unstoppable. When the running game struggles the team struggles with it. They rushed the ball only 11 times for 45 yards in their loss to Washington. Clinton Portis walked all over the defense for 121 yards.
If the Cowboys allow other teams to control the clock on them it will bite them come playoff time. If the rushing attack can't close games out, we're going to see more blown leads in bid D. And no new trophies.
Toast:
The Dallas Cowboys defense has produced one interception this season. The one lonely pick was by Greg Ellis, a defensive lineman.
Wile producing no interceptions, the secondary has allowed 50+ yard completions to Santana Moss, Donald Driver, and DeSean Jackson. If they continue to get burned like this it will be a short playoff run indeed.
Now What?:
When you put it all together you have a team that is susceptible to the big play, careless with the football, and runs the ball well every other week. The Cowboys are going to need to play better than that if they expect to bring home any hardware this season.
We can, and will, talk until we are blue in the face about the emotional status of Terrell Owens. We can plan Tony and Jessica's wedding and honeymoon...if we're lucky we'll even get some footage. These things are distractions.
If the Cowboys want to win in January they will need to do three things: take better care of the football, run the ball consistently, and make more plays in the defensive backfield.
Butterfingers:
The Cowboys have fumbled the football nine times this season. That's more than Detroit (6) and Houston (8). The Cowboys are tied with the terrible Bengals in this statistic. Tony Romo isn't doing the team any favors by averaging over one interception per game on top of that.
The Cowboys have enough offensive firepower to overcome turnovers, but that's no reason for them to try to lead the league in fumbles and win the Superbowl in the same year. Choose a goal.
Cowboys fans know all too well how costly fumbles in January can be. Work on the problem now please Mr. Phillips.
Stuffed:
When the Cowboys have run the ball well this year they have looked unstoppable. When the running game struggles the team struggles with it. They rushed the ball only 11 times for 45 yards in their loss to Washington. Clinton Portis walked all over the defense for 121 yards.
If the Cowboys allow other teams to control the clock on them it will bite them come playoff time. If the rushing attack can't close games out, we're going to see more blown leads in bid D. And no new trophies.
Toast:
The Dallas Cowboys defense has produced one interception this season. The one lonely pick was by Greg Ellis, a defensive lineman.
Wile producing no interceptions, the secondary has allowed 50+ yard completions to Santana Moss, Donald Driver, and DeSean Jackson. If they continue to get burned like this it will be a short playoff run indeed.
Now What?:
When you put it all together you have a team that is susceptible to the big play, careless with the football, and runs the ball well every other week. The Cowboys are going to need to play better than that if they expect to bring home any hardware this season.
New Orleans Saints: Meet Taylor Mehlhaff (K)
The New Orleans Saints placed kicker Martin Gramatica in injured reserve, and re-signed sixth round draft pick Taylor Mehlhalff this week.
Melhaf, is from Aberdeen, SD. where he was both an all state kicker and an all conference quarterback. After leaving Central High School he attended Wisconsin University.
As a Badger he was a lifetime 50 for 75 kicking field goals and was fourth in the nation in touch back percentage. He's got a big leg.
He's got a big chest too. At the NFL combine he just missed 14 bench press reps- typical of tight ends, but not kickers.
Hopefully for Saints fans, he'll be able to handle pressure and produce consistent results for the rest of the season.
Melhaf, is from Aberdeen, SD. where he was both an all state kicker and an all conference quarterback. After leaving Central High School he attended Wisconsin University.
As a Badger he was a lifetime 50 for 75 kicking field goals and was fourth in the nation in touch back percentage. He's got a big leg.
He's got a big chest too. At the NFL combine he just missed 14 bench press reps- typical of tight ends, but not kickers.
Hopefully for Saints fans, he'll be able to handle pressure and produce consistent results for the rest of the season.
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Hasselbeck, When Are You Coming Back?
It's been awfully quiet in Seattle on Sundays. In a city that prides itself on making more noise than anyone else in the country you can hear signs of apathy. Losing 44-6 does something to football fans: we turn off the game at half-time and do yard work. We play with our kids, and for a moment, life doesn't revolve around football.
People in Seattle are starting to give up on the Seahawks, and some fantasy owners have lost hope that Matt Hasselbeck will ever return to form. Let's not all jump off the Ship Canal bridge just yet. There is a glimmer of hope for the Seahawk's signal caller.
While the defense is dreadful. The running game is remarkably improved over last year. Julius Jones has played very well, rushing for 100 yards in back to back games. Shades of Shaun Alexander.
The injuries Seattle has sustained at wide receiver are well known at this point: Branch, Engram, Obamanu...the list seemed to go on forever. Two weeks ago Billy McMullen, and John Carlson were the primary targets for Hasselbeck. One year ago neither of those guys were in the NFL.
Billy McMullen doesn't know how to come back to the football. Maybe he knows how, but he forgets to do it on Sundays. This is why he was pursuing other interests before the desperate Seahawks phoned. If he's your number one receiver, there's going to be an adverse effect on your point production.
Off in the distance I see green gloves clapping. Deion Branch is wearing them, and he's back on the football field for what seems like the first time in decades.
Bobby Engram is back, and had eight catches in the debacle last Sunday.
I'm looking for Hasselbeck's numbers to dramatically improve over the last half of the season. He's not going to light it up, but he should play much better now that he has a few weapons again.
People in Seattle are starting to give up on the Seahawks, and some fantasy owners have lost hope that Matt Hasselbeck will ever return to form. Let's not all jump off the Ship Canal bridge just yet. There is a glimmer of hope for the Seahawk's signal caller.
While the defense is dreadful. The running game is remarkably improved over last year. Julius Jones has played very well, rushing for 100 yards in back to back games. Shades of Shaun Alexander.
The injuries Seattle has sustained at wide receiver are well known at this point: Branch, Engram, Obamanu...the list seemed to go on forever. Two weeks ago Billy McMullen, and John Carlson were the primary targets for Hasselbeck. One year ago neither of those guys were in the NFL.
Billy McMullen doesn't know how to come back to the football. Maybe he knows how, but he forgets to do it on Sundays. This is why he was pursuing other interests before the desperate Seahawks phoned. If he's your number one receiver, there's going to be an adverse effect on your point production.
Off in the distance I see green gloves clapping. Deion Branch is wearing them, and he's back on the football field for what seems like the first time in decades.
Bobby Engram is back, and had eight catches in the debacle last Sunday.
I'm looking for Hasselbeck's numbers to dramatically improve over the last half of the season. He's not going to light it up, but he should play much better now that he has a few weapons again.
Confessions of a Dallas Cowboys fan, born and raised in Philadelphia.
I was born at Women's General Hospital in Philadelphia, PA on September 13th, 1970. My parents met in Pittsburgh at a civil rights rally. My father, Smitty, having been born and raised in the steel city, was a rabid Steelers fan. My mother had no particular football affiliation.
Smitty's Pittsburgh sports affiliations ran deep. As a teenager he took me to meet Cool Papa Bell. The Negro League legend received us at his home, I watched in awe as history and my father discussed old times.
My birthday is significant, because it falls right at the beginning of football season. My father brought me home from the hospital, and religously propped me up on the couch every Sunday to watch football with him. When I say I've been watching football since birth I'm not kidding.
When I was five years old my parents bought me a Philadelphia Eagles jacket. I was learning to read at the time, so my parents and I often looked through the newspaper together, while I read what I could.
To my dismay I discovered the Philadelphia Eagles, whose emblem I wore upon my chest, were god awful at the game of football. My father rooted for the Steelers every week and they were good. Why was I stuck rooting for these losers?
Nobody mentioned anything to me about city pride, and I don't think I would have cared if they had. I wanted to root for a winner. I admit it, as a child I was a horrible front runner.
I wanted a Dallas Cowboys jacket, and on my sixth birthday, that's what I got.
I wore my Cowboys jacket to school every day. I flaunted my affiliation in front of the people who booed Mike Schmidt, Santa Claus, and egged the Redskins bus on Sunday. I was kind of shocked they didn't use batteries. Times changed, but I've always stayed true to my Cowboys.
Believe it or not, Philadelphians don't like Cowboys fans so much. they talk a lot of crap, but at the end of the day...they're sort of stuck with the Eagles. Wilbert Montgomery and Dick Vermeil got me back in the early eighties, but it's mostly been smooth sailing since then.
You don't have to waste time rooting for bad things to happen to the Eagles, you just know they will. Somebody will get hurt, (Donovan) or die in a car crash (Jerome) or get hurt (Randall).
They'll run the same play four times in a row on fourth and goal and get the same result four times in a row. I think it's the jerseys that can't win.
They'll hire Rich Kottite, draft Mike Mamula instead of Warren Sapp, and find new and inventive ways to repel talent. (T.O)
So that's how a person born and raised in Philly became a Cowboys fan.
Smitty's Pittsburgh sports affiliations ran deep. As a teenager he took me to meet Cool Papa Bell. The Negro League legend received us at his home, I watched in awe as history and my father discussed old times.
My birthday is significant, because it falls right at the beginning of football season. My father brought me home from the hospital, and religously propped me up on the couch every Sunday to watch football with him. When I say I've been watching football since birth I'm not kidding.
When I was five years old my parents bought me a Philadelphia Eagles jacket. I was learning to read at the time, so my parents and I often looked through the newspaper together, while I read what I could.
To my dismay I discovered the Philadelphia Eagles, whose emblem I wore upon my chest, were god awful at the game of football. My father rooted for the Steelers every week and they were good. Why was I stuck rooting for these losers?
Nobody mentioned anything to me about city pride, and I don't think I would have cared if they had. I wanted to root for a winner. I admit it, as a child I was a horrible front runner.
I wanted a Dallas Cowboys jacket, and on my sixth birthday, that's what I got.
I wore my Cowboys jacket to school every day. I flaunted my affiliation in front of the people who booed Mike Schmidt, Santa Claus, and egged the Redskins bus on Sunday. I was kind of shocked they didn't use batteries. Times changed, but I've always stayed true to my Cowboys.
Believe it or not, Philadelphians don't like Cowboys fans so much. they talk a lot of crap, but at the end of the day...they're sort of stuck with the Eagles. Wilbert Montgomery and Dick Vermeil got me back in the early eighties, but it's mostly been smooth sailing since then.
You don't have to waste time rooting for bad things to happen to the Eagles, you just know they will. Somebody will get hurt, (Donovan) or die in a car crash (Jerome) or get hurt (Randall).
They'll run the same play four times in a row on fourth and goal and get the same result four times in a row. I think it's the jerseys that can't win.
They'll hire Rich Kottite, draft Mike Mamula instead of Warren Sapp, and find new and inventive ways to repel talent. (T.O)
So that's how a person born and raised in Philly became a Cowboys fan.
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
It's Good! Kicking Up More Points
A fantasy point is a fantasy point. It doesn't matter if you get them from your quarterback, running back, or kicker, they all count as one.
I always draft a kicker in either the last or second to last round in my fantasy league, just as most experts advise. However, early in the season I re-evaluate my kicker pick. Pre-draft projections are not as important as regular season results.
By now it's clear which offenses are going to score points, but many fantasy owners are still anchored to their pre-draft assumptions. With a wise move at this point in the season, you can easily capture a 20 - 30 point advantage over the rest of your league.
In this article I show you how to pick a kicker, and talk about some kickers who's ownership percentage no longer reflects their expected results.
How To Pick A Kicker:
When picking a kicker it's important first to consider the job they do: kicking. Josh Brown makes the occasional tackle, but the rest of the league just kicks.
Since kickers can't do anything to change the number of times their team gets into the red-zone, when you're drafting a kicker, you're really drafting a piece of an offense.
It's like buying stock in the total number of points the team is going to score in a season. When the offense produces more points the kicker scores more points...your stock goes up.
Before the season started, people made estimations about total points scored for the season. The New England Patriots, for instance, were expected to score a lot of points.
Now that we know Tom Brady isn't coming back this year, we must adjust our assumptions to reflect this new information. Stephen Gostkowski is going to score far fewer points this year than we previously expected through no fault of his own. His team changed around him, and with it his probability of scoring.
When you're picking a kicker you want to buy stock in a team that is going to score lots of points. The Cowboys, Broncos, Chargers, Cardinals, and Saints right now are the league's five highest scoring offenses.
Whomever has the kicking job on these teams is likely to score more points than the rest of the league.
Look for high powered offenses and teams playing well. This is fertile ground for kicking points.
Getting It Wrong:
Matt Prater, one of the highest scoring kicker in football, is only owned in 76% of leagues on a popular fantasy site. The leader at every other position has an ownership percentage in the high 90's. What gives? Why aren't more high scoring kickers owned?
Because their triumphs almost never make the highlight film, kicker's achievements are largely ignored by the fantasy football community.
Neil Rackers plays for the Arizona Cardinals, one of the highest scoring teams in the NFL. He is owned in 57% of leagues. Unnoticed.
Shaun Suisham is owned in 19% of leagues. The Redskins just came off a four game winning streak and before this week had been playing excellent football. Nobody cares.
On the other hand plenty of the wrong kickers are heavily owned. Shayne Graham is owned in 57% of leagues. I guess because the Bengals were a good team a few years back owners are betting on the resurgence.
In 59% of leagues, somebody still has Stephen Gostowski (NE). Did these owners somehow missed the Tom Brady news? Can you see the importance of changing your assumptions?
What To Do:
Player values change every day, and if you don't react to even the most dramatic changes rest assured your opponents will.
Ask yourself a question: what teams do you think are going to score this season? Then choose your kicker accordingly. Most importantly be willing to change your opinion as new information comes to light.
Making good mid-season adjustments improves your probability of victory.
I always draft a kicker in either the last or second to last round in my fantasy league, just as most experts advise. However, early in the season I re-evaluate my kicker pick. Pre-draft projections are not as important as regular season results.
By now it's clear which offenses are going to score points, but many fantasy owners are still anchored to their pre-draft assumptions. With a wise move at this point in the season, you can easily capture a 20 - 30 point advantage over the rest of your league.
In this article I show you how to pick a kicker, and talk about some kickers who's ownership percentage no longer reflects their expected results.
How To Pick A Kicker:
When picking a kicker it's important first to consider the job they do: kicking. Josh Brown makes the occasional tackle, but the rest of the league just kicks.
Since kickers can't do anything to change the number of times their team gets into the red-zone, when you're drafting a kicker, you're really drafting a piece of an offense.
It's like buying stock in the total number of points the team is going to score in a season. When the offense produces more points the kicker scores more points...your stock goes up.
Before the season started, people made estimations about total points scored for the season. The New England Patriots, for instance, were expected to score a lot of points.
Now that we know Tom Brady isn't coming back this year, we must adjust our assumptions to reflect this new information. Stephen Gostkowski is going to score far fewer points this year than we previously expected through no fault of his own. His team changed around him, and with it his probability of scoring.
When you're picking a kicker you want to buy stock in a team that is going to score lots of points. The Cowboys, Broncos, Chargers, Cardinals, and Saints right now are the league's five highest scoring offenses.
Whomever has the kicking job on these teams is likely to score more points than the rest of the league.
Look for high powered offenses and teams playing well. This is fertile ground for kicking points.
Getting It Wrong:
Matt Prater, one of the highest scoring kicker in football, is only owned in 76% of leagues on a popular fantasy site. The leader at every other position has an ownership percentage in the high 90's. What gives? Why aren't more high scoring kickers owned?
Because their triumphs almost never make the highlight film, kicker's achievements are largely ignored by the fantasy football community.
Neil Rackers plays for the Arizona Cardinals, one of the highest scoring teams in the NFL. He is owned in 57% of leagues. Unnoticed.
Shaun Suisham is owned in 19% of leagues. The Redskins just came off a four game winning streak and before this week had been playing excellent football. Nobody cares.
On the other hand plenty of the wrong kickers are heavily owned. Shayne Graham is owned in 57% of leagues. I guess because the Bengals were a good team a few years back owners are betting on the resurgence.
In 59% of leagues, somebody still has Stephen Gostowski (NE). Did these owners somehow missed the Tom Brady news? Can you see the importance of changing your assumptions?
What To Do:
Player values change every day, and if you don't react to even the most dramatic changes rest assured your opponents will.
Ask yourself a question: what teams do you think are going to score this season? Then choose your kicker accordingly. Most importantly be willing to change your opinion as new information comes to light.
Making good mid-season adjustments improves your probability of victory.
Sin City! How To Use Las Vegas Lines To Score Fantasy Points
One thing is clear to every fantasy football owner: He who scores the most points wins. Week after week, we scratch our heads and try to predict the answer to this question to the best of our ability: Who is going to score points this week?
Fortunately for us, fantasy football owners aren’t the only people pondering these questions. Approximately $40 million is wagered on football each weekend in Nevada, according to USA Today.
That’s real money, folks. You thought you had problems because it’s going to cost you two bucks to drop Laurence Maroney. (Do it anyway.)
Each week, one can wager on football in several ways in Las Vegas. The most popular wagers are the Game Line and the Over/Under. Because $40 million a week is riding on these results, you can bet there are people out there doing major research on the subjects.
As a fantasy football owner, you can borrow this research as you decide whom to start and sit each week. Las Vegas has done their homework, and you might as well copy their answers.
It’s safe to say that 42 is the expected number of points to be scored in that game. As a fantasy owner, if you check the over/under every week, you’ll know which games Las Vegas thinks will be high scoring.
Very useful information.
Start players in the high-scoring games, and with all other things being equal, you'll score more points and win more games.
Part Two: Game Lines
But the over/under doesn’t tell us everything we need to know. What if the over/under is high because our team is going to get beat 44-6? Sorry Seahawks.
Las Vegas has an opinion on who's going to win called the game line. For instance, next week, the Dallas Cowboys are five-and-a-half point favorites over the Arizona Cardinals. If you bet on the Cowboys, they must win by at least six points for you to win your bet.
The over/under on the Cowboys game is 50. So Las Vegas is saying that they expect the Cowboys to beat the Cardinals by five-and-a-half with 50 total points being scored in the game.
28–22 Cowboys would be the expected final score.
Conclusions
When you take these two pieces of information into consideration as you set your lineup, you’re able to get the market’s best guess at how many points each team will score.
I could bore you with a dissertation on the merits of the efficient market hypothesis, but it’s better if you just trust me that this is a credible source.
Quite simply: Start players from favored teams when the over/under is high. These players rate to score more points than players in games with low over/unders.
Easy enough, right?
Applying this strategy over time should lead to higher point totals for your team.
Thanks for reading, and feel free to leave your questions on specific situations here. I'll be answering questions every day until Saturday.
Fantasy Advice: How To Tackle Defensive Scoring
When I first started playing fantasy football, I was completely frustrated by defensive scoring. Predicting who was going to return interceptions for touchdowns seemed like too daunting a task.
Even worse, it seemed like every time I changed defenses, the guys I had been starting all year would finally score. I felt cursed, and I threw up my hands in exasperation. I decided I would just start the same team every week and hope for the best. This was not the best strategy.
I’ve matured as an owner and come to terms with the random nature of defensive scoring. I now play this part of the game very proactively. Like a card-counting blackjack player, I bet when the odds are in my favor and sit out when they are not.
Last season, I started 10 different defenses in 14 weeks. That combination of defenses was the NFL's third-highest-scoring defense in terms of fantasy points. I picked up a 50 to 80-point advantage over most of my league just by taking a few minutes each week to look for turnovers.
Below, I detail my four-part approach to choosing a defense each week. Please don't tell anyone in my league about it! At the bottom of the page, there is a chart showing the expected turnover leaders through Week Five.
Part One: Fumbles
While fumbles are mostly random, some people do have butterfingers. Remember Tiki Barber before he got the Kung–Fu ball grip?
Last year, in the NFL, there were 800 fumbles, 384 of which were recovered by the defense. Over the long hall, if a player puts the ball on the turf, it is 48 percent likely to be recovered by the defense.
As fans and fantasy owners, we tend to focus too much on fumbles lost, which is more a matter of luck. The “no harm, no foul” rule doesn’t apply when it’s your job to predict future harmful fouls. Every ball on the grass is worth 48 percent of a turnover in my eyes.
The logic here is simple: more balls on the ground equal more turnovers, and more turnovers equals more fantasy points for you.
Part Two: Interceptions
An interception is an interception, so I won’t spend much time here. Obviously, if a team is throwing a lot of picks, starting their opponent as your defense is going to lead to more chances for defensive touchdowns.
More defensive touchdowns equals more fantasy points for you.
Part Three: Sacks
Sacks are a very important part of the equation. Sacks can often lead to fumbles, and the threat of sacks can often lead to interceptions. Lots of times balls get intercepted because the quarterback’s throwing motion was disrupted by a pass rusher.
Ideally, you should look for a team that is getting more sacks than the league average per game and start them against a team that is allowing more sacks than the league average per game. If both teams play like they have been, you should pick up some points.
You may not always get the ideal matchup, but this should be a major factor, as you’re considering which defense to start each week.
Part Four: Inexperienced Quarterbacks
Quarterbacks touch the ball on every offensive play, outside of Miami. Wildcat offense notwithstanding, every play begins with the center snapping the ball to the quarterback. There’s one chance for a fumble. Next the quarterback either hands the ball to a running back, another fumble opportunity, or passes the ball, creating a chance for an interception.
Inexperienced quarterbacks are more likely to foul up these processes than their veteran counterparts. This problem is exacerbated if the new quarterback hasn’t taken many reps with the first-team offense before he starts.
Think Tyler Thigpen.
Quarterbacks making their first NFL start due to an injury to the starter are much more likely to turn the ball over—and at a far higher rate, to boot—than quarterbacks who have practiced with the starters since July.
Going back to the blackjack analogy, this is a deck with lots of face cards left in it—you want to increase your wager in these situations.
It is a sin to sit by idly and allow these defensive points go unclaimed. It could be the difference between winning and losing.
Conclusions
While you can’t predict exactly when turnovers are going to occur, you do know some things about how they occur. You should use that information to your advantage.
Quarterbacks in distress, whether through defensive pressure or inexperience, make bad decisions with the football and create defensive scoring opportunities.
If you take a look inside the numbers each week, you’ll be able to see where these mistakes are more likely to happen and position your team to take advantage of the situation.
Data: Total Fumbles + Interceptions Leaders for Week Five:
Team FUM LST INT TOT
1. Cincinnati Bengals 9 4 7 16
2. Kansas City Chiefs 7 2 8 15
3. Dallas Cowboys 9 3 5 14
4. Houston Texans 8 3 6 14
5. San Francisco 49ers 8 6 6 14
6. Detroit Lions 6 1 7 13
Feel free to post any questions you have about specific situations. I'll answer questions once a day through Saturday. Thanks for reading.
Volatility: Helpful Or Harmful In Fantasy Football?
As fantasy football owners it’s easy to assume that points equal wins. After all, if you score more than your opponent in any given week, you win.
But the manner in which your points are scored is too important to ignore. Ever scored the most points in your fantasy league four times in a year only to finish 6-8 and out of the playoffs? Unless your league pays a hefty bounty for high score of the week, these seasons end in frustration.
Conventional fantasy football wisdom tells us to draft quarterbacks and wide receivers from the same team. These correlation bets only increase the volatility of our point totals…so we look great some weeks, and horrible others. Remember we’re trying to win games not bragging rights.
What if we thought about fantasy football in terms of red zone chances? Red zone chances are much easier to predict than individual player points.
Therefore if we collect the quarterback, short yardage back, and kicker from a team we expect to be in the red zone frequently we can provide ourselves with a regular stream of fantasy points.
This regularity will help us win close games and turn our 6-8 season into an 8-6 season, and giving us that date for week fifteen we all crave.
On each red zone chance only a few things can happen: Passing Touchdowns, Rushing Touchdowns, Field Goals, and Non-Scores.
If we have our players distributed properly every time our real team enters the red zone, our fantasy team will be a favorite to come away with points. These points add up.
Therefore collecting players from teams who will outperform at getting to the red zone should lead to fantasy wins.
If we focus our attention on a thing we can predict (i.e. the number of possessions in a game, and red zone opportunities per possession.) we’ll be more likely to structure our teams to score slightly above the league average every week.
If most other team's scores are wildly varying this strategy should translate into more wins..
Winning fantasy games is what you drafted your team to do. Isn’t it?
Abstinence Only: Bengals, Browns, and Rams Can't Score
The object of the game of football is to score more points than your opponent.
We spend time talking about statistics and gossiping about tradition, but, at the end of the day, it's about putting points on the board.
Right now, three teams in the NFL are averaging fewer than 15 points per game, after having played at least four games.
Cincinnati Bengals (0-4): 13 Points/Game, 231 Yards/Game, –4 Turnover Ratio
"Houshamzilly! Championship!" It seems like a distant memory in 2008. If they played the commercial any more I think I would cry.
Ocho Cinco, ¿dónde están mis puntos?
The Bengals played pretty well against the Giants, so there might be some hope. But all hope involves Carson Palmer playing quarterback.
They have enough problems. If Palmer doesn't play, we will see more mistake-filled games.
Marvin Lewis seems like a nice guy, but it looks like the Bengals' season is already in the bowl. We’re just waiting for the flush.
Cleveland Browns (1-3): 11.5 Points/Game, 210 Yards/Game, +1 Turnover Ratio
Ladies and gentlemen, we have ourselves a quarterback controversy. Derek Anderson has played poorly enough this year to remind Browns fans that they have an expensive local boy sitting on the bench.
Braylon Edwards has the dropsies, and nobody seems to be able to block anybody. All of this makes Jamaal Lewis look very old and mediocre.
If you can't light up the Carson Palmer-less Bengals, whom can you light up in this league? I'd like the Browns to show me.
St. Louis Rams (0-4): 10.8 Points/Game, 246.8 Yards/Game, –3 Turnover Ratio
The Rams can't stop you.
The Rams can't score.
The Rams' head coach is nearly out the door.
I bet you guys didn't expect to miss Mike Martz so much—did ya?
This team and organization are in complete disarray. If I were the owner, I'd start selling off the parts for draft picks while I searched for my replacement GM and Head Coach.
If you don't score, you can't win. These teams can't score.
Start That Back! The Chiefs, Packers, and Broncos Have Soft Run-Defenses
To start, or not to start? That is the fantasy football question. There’s no worse feeling than going to work Monday morning knowing that you could have won if you’d only started
After four weeks, we’re beginning to see who the weak defenses are in the league. Some teams have specific weaknesses, and knowing those weaknesses can help your fantasy football team.
In this article, rushing defense is examined.
Kansas City Chiefs (1-3): 5.3 Yards/Carry; 176.5 Yards/Game; 6 TD
In Game One, the Patriots averaged 4.5 yards/carry against the Chiefs, as they beat them 17-10 after Tom Brady’s injury.
In Week Two, Darren McFadden made Kansas City's defensive front look like Alabama, rushing for 164 yards and one touchdown.
In Week Three, Michael Turner had three rushing touchdowns and over 100 yards, as the Falcons took advantage of three Tyler Thigpen interceptions and ripped apart the Chiefs, 38-14.
Last week, they were finally able to hold an opponent under 100 yards rushing. Denver tallied only 94 yards on 22 carries, and the Chiefs snapped their 12-game losing streak, dating back to last year.
Author Poll Results
What team will allow the highest YPC average this year?
-
Kansas City Chiefs
-
Green Bay Packers
-
Denver Broncos
-
Detroit Lions
- Total votes: 2427
With performances like these it’s easy to feel good about starting your running backs against the Chiefs.
Green Bay Packers (2-2): 5.2 Yards/Carry; 157.8 Yards/Game; 4 TD
In Week One at Lambeau Field, the Minnesota Vikings ran for 187 yards in a losing effort against the Packers. Adrian Peterson led the way with 19 attempts for 103 yards and a touchdown. It wasn’t the best start for the Packers' run D.
In Week Two, the Packers traveled to Detroit to take on the Lions. Turning three interceptions into 48 points, the Packers' run defense was never really tested.
The Dallas Cowboys and the Sunday Night Football crew rode into Lambeau for Week Three. Marion Barber and Felix Jones showed that the Packers' run defense was suspect, combining for 218 yards and two touchdowns.I'd love for my fantasy backs to put up numbers like these week in and week out. Wouldn't you?
In Week Four, the Packers' run defense was again exploited, this time by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, who had seen the Packers-Cowboys game film. Ernest Graham and Warrick Dunn combined for 174 yards and a touchdown, as the Packers took a sound beating at Raymond James field.
This is bad news for Packers nation. Green Bay simply must shore up their run defense if they hope to repeat as NFC North champions...but in fantasy football their losses could be your gains.
Denver Broncos (3-1): 5.0 Yards/Carry; 132.8 Yards/Game; 5 TD
While the Broncos allowed under 100 yards rushing in their first three games, the Denver offense was really clicking. Teams were forced to pass, they had success, and Denver pulled out some close, high-scoring games.
The Kansas City Chiefs may have shown the league how to silence Jay Cutler and Brandon Marshall. Make them watch.
The Chiefs have been abysmal on both sides of the ball. Everybody in the building knew there was going to be a heavy dose of Larry Johnson in this game, and the Broncos just couldn’t stop him. 198 yards and two touchdowns later, and the Broncos looked very ordinary.
Most teams will want to shorten the game against the Broncos. So running backs on those teams should see some extra carries. Making them good fantasy football starts.
So this Friday afternoon while you're trying to figure out what running backs to start look for the Chiefs, Packers, and Broncos...they seem to create fantasy points for their opponents.
Carolina Panthers-Atlanta Falcons: A Big Game for Jonathan Stewart?
Carolina's Jonathan Stewart, the 5'10" rookie from Oregon, is off to a nice start this year, a trend I expect will continue this week against the Atlanta Falcons.
Hailing from Olympia, Washington, he has racked up three touchdowns so far this season. Because Stewart is bigger than teammate DeAngelo Williams, he’s been getting most of Carolina’s touches in the red zone.
This week Carolina hosts the Atlanta Falcons.
The Falcons come into the game 2-1 on the season, having beaten the snot out of the Kansas City Chiefs last week.
The Falcons' other win came against the Detroit Lions, another stellar football club. In both these games, Atlanta was able to run the ball easily, and rookie QB Matt Ryan was never really tested.
In Week 2, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers were able to stop the Falcons' run, and the young Mr. Ryan responded by completing 13/33 passes for 158 yards and two interceptions.
Believe it or not, the Falcons looked very ordinary, losing 24-9.
Atlanta's defense has also looked soft against the run. They are allowing 5.1 yards per carry and 139.3 yards per game, having allowed two runs of over 40 yards in three short weeks. Not the best.
Carolina has run the ball successfully on every opponent but the Minnesota Vikings. But let's face it: Nobody runs on Minnesota.
If the Panthers' defense is able to stifle Atlanta's Michael Turner, Matt Ryan is going to make mistakes.
Those mistakes should lead to more red zone touches for Jonathan Stewart, as well as fantasy points for the Carolina defense. I wouldn't be shocked if Stewart had a 40-yard-plus touchdown run or if the Panthers scored a defensive touchdown.
The Falcons have only played well at home against terrible teams.
This week they are on the road against a team who can play.
Rookie quarterbacks don't usually come into the NFL, go on the road, and light it up.
Look for the Panthers' defense to teach Matt Ryan a few lessons and for Jonathan Stewart to capitalize on those opportunities. I'd start them both this week.
The Atlanta Falcons Can Help Your Team...This Week
Fantasy football defensive points are scored when mistakes are made by the offense. Whether the defense causes these mistakes or simply watches them happen, a fumble is a fumble.
Enter the Kansas City Chiefs. Led by Tyler Thigpen and a disgruntled Larry Johnson, Herman Edward's team is in a tailspin.
The Oakland Raiders ran all over them last week, and I'm looking for Michael Turner to continue the onslaught this week. This will give Thigpen and company even less time with the ball.
If the Chiefs abandon the running game like they did last week, look for two interceptions and five sacks out of the Atlanta Falcons defense. Who knows? They might even return one for 6 if you're lucky.
Contract Blues: Why Do NFL Players Hold Out?
Contract negotiations between teams and players dominate NFL news in the summer months. Dirty, sexy, money talk comes complete with agent sound bites and team press releases promising to do “whatever is best for the organization.”
Fans get angry as the season's hopes become contingent upon the negotiating skills of their local front office staff. As much as we love the game, the NFL is a business.
The more we understand the business relationship between players and teams the better we will be able to temper our emotions during this difficult part of the season. The truth of the matter is that players hold out for one major reason: job insecurity.
Professional football is obviously a very competitive industry. Every year, NFL teams draft hundreds of young men that intend to take a current player’s job. The number of openings is finite, and the number of candidates continues to grow every year.
Professional players with contracts need to go out and make their team every year in order to keep their jobs. In this environment, it is easy to see why a player would want to make as much money as possible, as quickly as possible.
He never knows when the golden goose is going to die—leaving him to a life of broadcasting, if he’s lucky, or automobile sales if he's not so lucky.
NFL contracts are only binding to the player. Brett Favre, after retiring from the Green Bay Packers, was still not free to pursue a contract with the Minnesota Vikings. The Packers owned his rights.
Shaun Alexander signed an eight-year contract worth $62 million, with $15 million guaranteed in March of 2006.
It has been two-and-a-half years since then, and Mr. Alexander is out of football, against his will. Two injuries and a few boos after winning the league’s Most Valuable Player award, Alexander literally can't find a job with any team at all.
If the MVP can be forgotten so quickly, why should any of these Pro Bowlers think there will be any loyalty shown towards them?
Shaun Alexander played poorly and was cut by an organization that just made a financial obligation to him. He's never going to get anything close to $62 million from the Seattle Seahawks.
If a player plays well, why shouldn’t he insist on more money? It seems fair.
As if that weren't bad enough, even guaranteed money from an NFL franchise isn’t exactly guaranteed, when push comes to shove.
Let’s examine the cases of Ricky Williams and Michael Vick.
Ricky Williams retired from the NFL in 2004—an abrupt move that shocked the football world. The Miami Dolphins sued Mr. Williams for breach of contract, and in February of 2005 a federal judge ordered him to repay $8.6 million in bonus money.
The Atlanta Falcons tried to recoup over $20 million in roster bonuses from Michael Vick after he was convicted in a federal dog-fighting case. This time, the courts ruled in favor of the player, stating that he clearly made the roster and was therefore due the bonuses.
Considering the environment, it’s easy to see why players want as many guaranteed dollars as they can get. Even the guaranteed dollars are contestable in court, and NFL teams feel very little shame about trying to get their money back when their bets on player performance don’t pan out.
Should the players really refrain from extorting extra cash when it’s the player who has the power?
NFL teams have the option to cut every player before the season starts. Even after bonuses have been paid, NFL teams aren't above asking for their money back in court.
Ask yourselves: Would you be loyal to these organizations? Or would you juice them for as much money as humanly possible?
I know what I would do.
Fans get angry as the season's hopes become contingent upon the negotiating skills of their local front office staff. As much as we love the game, the NFL is a business.
The more we understand the business relationship between players and teams the better we will be able to temper our emotions during this difficult part of the season. The truth of the matter is that players hold out for one major reason: job insecurity.
Professional football is obviously a very competitive industry. Every year, NFL teams draft hundreds of young men that intend to take a current player’s job. The number of openings is finite, and the number of candidates continues to grow every year.
Professional players with contracts need to go out and make their team every year in order to keep their jobs. In this environment, it is easy to see why a player would want to make as much money as possible, as quickly as possible.
He never knows when the golden goose is going to die—leaving him to a life of broadcasting, if he’s lucky, or automobile sales if he's not so lucky.
NFL contracts are only binding to the player. Brett Favre, after retiring from the Green Bay Packers, was still not free to pursue a contract with the Minnesota Vikings. The Packers owned his rights.
Shaun Alexander signed an eight-year contract worth $62 million, with $15 million guaranteed in March of 2006.
It has been two-and-a-half years since then, and Mr. Alexander is out of football, against his will. Two injuries and a few boos after winning the league’s Most Valuable Player award, Alexander literally can't find a job with any team at all.
If the MVP can be forgotten so quickly, why should any of these Pro Bowlers think there will be any loyalty shown towards them?
Shaun Alexander played poorly and was cut by an organization that just made a financial obligation to him. He's never going to get anything close to $62 million from the Seattle Seahawks.
If a player plays well, why shouldn’t he insist on more money? It seems fair.
As if that weren't bad enough, even guaranteed money from an NFL franchise isn’t exactly guaranteed, when push comes to shove.
Let’s examine the cases of Ricky Williams and Michael Vick.
Ricky Williams retired from the NFL in 2004—an abrupt move that shocked the football world. The Miami Dolphins sued Mr. Williams for breach of contract, and in February of 2005 a federal judge ordered him to repay $8.6 million in bonus money.
The Atlanta Falcons tried to recoup over $20 million in roster bonuses from Michael Vick after he was convicted in a federal dog-fighting case. This time, the courts ruled in favor of the player, stating that he clearly made the roster and was therefore due the bonuses.
Considering the environment, it’s easy to see why players want as many guaranteed dollars as they can get. Even the guaranteed dollars are contestable in court, and NFL teams feel very little shame about trying to get their money back when their bets on player performance don’t pan out.
Should the players really refrain from extorting extra cash when it’s the player who has the power?
NFL teams have the option to cut every player before the season starts. Even after bonuses have been paid, NFL teams aren't above asking for their money back in court.
Ask yourselves: Would you be loyal to these organizations? Or would you juice them for as much money as humanly possible?
I know what I would do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
